The following article is a reworked
version of a presentation I gave some years ago to one of the
companies I consulted for:
Introduction
"There is nothing in a
caterpillar that tells you it's going to be a butterfly." -
R. Buckminster Fuller
We often find companies descending into
run-of-the-mill worker mentality with under-productive staff and we
wonder why?
We are quite willing to pay R8500 to
R9000 per month for a Toyota Land Cruiser pick-up, while we most
often use it for no more than an hour to three hours per day
travelling to and from the office. The Cruiser is nothing but a
transport vehicle, which achieves the same as a municipal bus or
taxi.
At the same time we have an employee
that gives us his time and productivity for eight hours each day,
plus he/she also spends the same amount of time travelling to and
from the office. The Cruiser does not add anything to the company
other than being a tax-deductible expense, while the employee adds to
the company. Without the land Cruiser one could always get to the
office by some other means, be it a bus, taxi or driving club.
We spend R9000 per month (or MUCH more)
on a vehicle in which we spend only an hour to three hours each day,
all to impress our friends, neighbours and family, yet we are not
willing to pay R9000 once off for a bed on which we spend EIGHT hours
per day?
While we are quite willing to pay R9000
each month for a transport medium like a Land Cruiser pick-up, we
only pay the employee R5000 per month for his eight hours, time and
effort dedicated to the company. The figures do not seem to add up.
Do we pay for value?
No one is stupid enough to pay a
Porsche's monthly instalment on a 1964 VW Beetle and conversely we
also cannot buy a Porsche at the price of a 1964 VW Beetle.
Strangely enough though, we so often
find this happening in companies. They willingly pay a Porsche's
instalment for someone worth no more than a 1964 VW Beetle, while on
the other hand they very often pay a Porsche no more than the
instalment on an old dilapidated VW Beetle.
Companies Pay the Job not the Person
It does not matter who fills a
particular position in a company, because the salary remains the
same. The person is not paid for his/her effort, dedication, hard
work, loyalty and input, the salary is based on the position within
the company. Positions are awarded salary scales, irrespective of
whether a Porsche or Beetle is used for the task.
Companies lose good employees, because
the person is not being paid based on his/her value to the company.
Company input does not compare with employee output.
Employees are often deployed in the
wrong positions and given the wrong tasks.
We often find a Porsche employee
sitting in a VW Beetle position, either being paid in accordance with
that position. Eventually this employee then starts dragging his/her
feet, becoming the position, rather than being utilised as a Porsche.
Companies promote employees according
to standard protocols. An employee cannot be promoted, because he/she
has not been with the company long enough, or because he/she is too
young? What kind of reasoning is that? If you have a Porsche are you
going to drive it like a VW Beetle? Would you go off-road racing in
your Porsche? Would you put a Land Cruiser on a race track expecting
it to compete against a Porsche?
Porsche vs VW Beetle vs Toyota Land
Cruiser
VW Beetle Employees has proven
it self able to survive for many decades if taken care of and driven
at no more than 110km/h downhill and 50km/h uphill. Never push the VW
Beetle beyond it's limits, because it would break down and last no
more than a few years.
The VW Beetle employee is a loyal,
dependable, trust worthy employee that should be deployed in those
positions applicable to a VW Beetle. Such an employee will always be
on time, thankful for the job, respecting towards his employer and
the job, but he/she should not be driven or challenged. They give
steady output.
The VW Beetle is always on the job, but
he is only on the job while at the job, not after-hours.
Toyota Land Cruiser Employees is
tough and it loves challenges, difficult tasks. The tougher the
terrain, the more difficult the obstacles and tasks the better. They
love challenges and as long as the challenges are there and the
salary comparable to the risks and challenges this is a super hard
working employee that could drive a deadline to death. Tell him/her
it cannot be done and watch him jump to the fore and make it happen.
But PLEASE do not pay him a VW Beetle salary, make him realise his
successes are appreciated and respected. Never pay him a Porsche
salary, because he would squander it on a Porsche and see no sense in
having to prove himself. He thrives on a good Land Cruiser salary
with production bonuses. The position must be a challenge. Without
challenges he gets bored and lands in trouble. He often does not
belong to one single division within the company and needs to be
shifted to other sectors when needed. The moment the challenges are
gone in one division he/she needs to be challenged with a new venture
in another division within the company. He loves accolades. Give him
a pat on the back at a staff meeting and he is yours for the day.
The Land Cruiser does not perceive the
VW Beetle as a threat and gets along with him quite easily. The
Porsche is way to flashy and smart for the Land Cruiser. The Porsche
is too bling-bling for the rugged Land Cruiser that does not mind
getting himself dirty, while trying to achieve where no one else
dares to tread. If he fails he takes it with a shrug, because at he
knows he tried and now knows what works and what does not work. Sadly
the Land Cruiser is the type of employee that often gets fired for
having failed at a task no one else had the guts to attempt. You want
this Land Cruiser in your company. He may cost you money once in a
while, but he would most often get you where no one else could. He
never says no to a challenge thrown at him by a Porsche.
The Land Cruiser does not care about
working hours, he wants to get the job done and would stay until the
job is done and make sure the job is delivered on time, but better
you pay (reward) him for it. He could kill you with over-time claims,
but you'll get your job done.
The Porsche Employee deserves
the salary of a Porsche. The Porsche comes up with the ideas that the
Land Cruiser has to make happen. The Porsche is a mover, a very fast
mover. He sees opportunities where no one else does, never break his
speed while he is moving, because eh does not like having to catch
up. He loves being way out in-front, not with the VW Beetles. He
challenges and uses the Land Cruiser to make his dreams a reality.
Do not neglect the Porsche, because he
is a mover and would move to your opposition if offered the
opportunity to excel. The Porsche moves at a fast pace, gets things
done. He acts on the moment when the opportunity is available.
Appoint a committee to investigate his proposal and he would be with
your opposition before your committee exits the conference room. He
would turn you opposition into your worst nightmare and eventually
your opposition would buy your company.
He may not be at work, but his mind
never leaves work. He could be a jet-setter and a party freak, but he
will meet people you never knew existed. He would get deals and make
deals you would never even have thought of. He comes up with new
ideas and implements them without you even knowing. He often
implements ideas that you only learn about by chance or long
afterwards. He doesn't wait for approval he is a doer. He implements
and you reap the benefits, do not put on the breaks while he is
moving with new ideas. Always give his ideas a chance, it usually is
worth it. He is a lateral thinker and his ideas may differ from your
stagnant ways, but he is with it and is moving with the times.
Pay him/her what he/she is worth,
before someone else does it. He is going places either in your
company or with another company.
Vehicles Working As a Team
The Porsche is the driver controlling
the fuel pedal, the clutch, the breaks the steering wheel. The Land
Cruiser is the engine delivering the power and torque in response to
the demands of the Porsche, while the VW Beetle is the chassis of the
company. The Chassis has to be able to handle the torque and the
rough terrain. The Porsche determines the growth and the pace at
which the company operates and grows, while the Land Cruiser is the
one ensuring it actually happens.
Procrastination
"The highest challenge inside
organisations is to enable each person to contribute his or her
unique talents and passion to accomplish the organization's purpose."
- Stephen R. Covey
I would briefly like to say something
about procrastination, which is a problem in most companies.
The word "procrastination"
should be equated with the word "insecurity". Insecurity
leads to procrastination. Procrastination is a symptom, not a
disease, find the causality and remedy it.
Whenever an employee is found to be
procrastinating on a particular task, or in a particular position, be
certain it is often due to a sense of insecurity relating to the
particular task or generally the position. Sit down with the employee
and guide him through the task or provide him/her with appropriate
training and the procrastination will disappear. Employing a VW
Beetle in the position of either a Land Cruiser or a Porsche would
certainly lead to procrastination due to insecurity.
Procrastination should not be confused
with boredom or a lack of work. Often a lack of work would lead to
procrastination, because the employee is so used to not having
anything to do that when he/she actually does get some work they
grown too lazy to work.
Another cause for general
procrastination is employing a Porsche or Land Cruiser in the wrong
position. The Porsche would be of the opinion that the task is so
minor or inferior that it would only take him/her a minute or two to
complete, with the consequence that he never gets to it. To the Land
Cruiser the job may not seen as a challenge and something he could
quickly fit in-between other more pressing / important work and never
gets to doing it.
A challenging job would procrastinate
the VW Beetle, a job without challenges would bore the Land Cruiser,
while frustrating the Porsche who sees it as inferior or a waste of
time.
Conclusion
Being "qualified for the job"
does not mean holding academic qualifications in-line with the job
description. Being qualified for the job means being able to do the
job and giving the company value for money, with or without academic
qualifications. "Natural ability without College education
has more often attained to glory, success and virtue than College
education without natural ability."
Being Qualified doesn't mean you're
Educated: "A University Degree does not mean you are
educated. Quite the contrary. It means that you have been opened up
to a perpetual state of ignorance and thus a lifelong hunger for more
-- more ideas, more knowledge, more good thoughts, more challenges,
more of everything. Some of the dumbest people I know went to great,
prestigious colleges and universities. They walked across the stage,
took degree in hand, pronounced themselves well-educated and
proceeded never to read another book, entertain another fresh idea or
tax their minds in any way beyond the minimum limits required to make
a living or make it socially or both." - Said by James
Lehrer, host of US television news-analysis programme, in a
commencement address to one of his shows.
A man walking down a street one evening
comes across a man on his hands and knees under a street-lamp,
obviously searching for something. He asks the man what he is
searching for and if he can help. The man answers that he had lost
his car keys. After many minutes of helping in the search he asks the
man if he is sure that this is the place where he had lost his keys.
The man says "No I don't think I lost it here, but this is the
only place where the light is shining." This is not the person
you want to employ in a position that should be filled by a Porsche.
There is no Law that forces you to pay
everyone the same, irrespective of their performance. If someone
within the VW Beetle group stands out above the rest and performs
better than the rest, why would you want to lose that person by not
paying him/her their true worth to your company? Is that person worth
the same as everyone else in that group? Does that person not give
you more value for your money?
There is no Law that prevents a company
to redeploy its employees as it sees fit. If an employee is unfit for
a particular position, redeploy him or her for optimum performance
and value to the company.
It has always amazed me how a company
would lose a particular person and then employ three other people in
that person's position, who still do not give the company the same
value as the person it had lost. If you are willing to pay three
other people each a salary, while you could have paid that original
employee double and retained him or her, you need psychiatric help.
Pay your employees in accordance with
their value to your company, not in-line with some outdated company
policy. A loyal employee retained is worth a 100 new employees.
For some reason companies tend to find
it easier to spend huge sums of money on things like flashy cars that
mean nothing to the company, than spending money on things that make
money for the company, like staff.
Some employees will never fit into your
company and that needs to be understood, accepted and respected. If
he/she does not fit in with your company, allow them their freedom to
move elsewhere. Find them a job with your competition and let your
competition make them an offer.
In your entire decision making, always
place the company at the centre and ensure that all decisions are to
the advantage of the company. That way everyone will gain in the
long-run.
If it is worth doing - it is worth
doing it well. In the end though we also need to realise that a man
who provides work and income to 500 people certainly does deserve his
own luxury, don't you agree? It stands to reason that people go into
business to make money and make a better living for themselves and it
stands to reason that the owner / CEO would earn the best salary in
the company by far, after all he is your bread and butter.
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical advice. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem, promptly contact your professional healthcare provider.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical advice. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem, promptly contact your professional healthcare provider.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za