(Natural News) The government of Japan’s Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare is speaking out about the destructive side effects coming from popular, worldwide-promoted HPV vaccines Gardasil and Cervarix. Gardasil is Merck’s opus and Cervarix is manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline.
As of today, an estimated 3.28 million Japanese people alone have been inoculated with these HPV vaccinations. So far, 1,968 adverse cases have been presented to the Japanese government, detailing severe medical side effects.
The Japanese people are reporting side effects ranging from “long-term pain and numbness to infertility and paralysis.” In the wake of these complaints, the Japanese government has decided to withdraw its support for these widely pushed and controversial HPV inoculations.
The government of Japan looking into nearly 2,000 adverse HPV vaccine reactions
The HPV vaccinations have not been stalled or suspended in Japan. The government is just not actively promoting the use of them anymore. These HPV vaccines are still available for free to girls provided through subsidies, mandated by law. The only difference now is that Japanese medical institutions must now inform the young girls the government health ministry does not recommend the vaccines any longer.
Despite mounting evidence of Gardasil dangers, other countries remain under the thumb of Merck's vaccinations spell.
Here is a list of US hospitalization incidences due to HPV vaccinations, provided by SaneVax.org:
http://www.thehealthyhomeeconomist.com
Read full article
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
Thursday, 11 July 2013
Sunday, 7 July 2013
Couples who do not argue are more likely to live longer
London - Money, the mother-in-law, which TV channel to watch... the possibilities for rows between husband and wife are endless.
But while an argument might clear the air it is likely to be bad for your health, according to medical researchers.
A 20-year study of married life found that couples who do not argue are more likely to stay healthy and live longer than those who do.
Among the most common subjects causing the arguments that lead to health problems are finance and the in-laws.
When it comes to the vow “in sickness and in health”, it seems to depend on how much friction there is in the marriage, said the American researchers.
They followed nearly 1 700 married adults over two decades, measuring both their physical health and responses to regular surveys on arguments, happiness and quality of life.
And they found that the more they argued, the worse their general health, suggesting that being happily married is a key to long life.
The reason could be that a contented couple do more to look after each other, the researchers from Brigham Young University in Utah told the Journal of Marriage and Family.
They are more likely to cook and eat healthier meals together, for instance, rather than one storming off to the pub or staying late at work eating junk food.
Less stress means they sleep better, and if they get on they will encourage each other to drop bad habits, such as smoking, and to keep doctors appointments, for example. Also, when couples get on they do other things together such as sport or other beneficial outdoor activities. - Daily Mail
Source: IOL Lifestyle
But while an argument might clear the air it is likely to be bad for your health, according to medical researchers.
A 20-year study of married life found that couples who do not argue are more likely to stay healthy and live longer than those who do.
Among the most common subjects causing the arguments that lead to health problems are finance and the in-laws.
When it comes to the vow “in sickness and in health”, it seems to depend on how much friction there is in the marriage, said the American researchers.
They followed nearly 1 700 married adults over two decades, measuring both their physical health and responses to regular surveys on arguments, happiness and quality of life.
And they found that the more they argued, the worse their general health, suggesting that being happily married is a key to long life.
The reason could be that a contented couple do more to look after each other, the researchers from Brigham Young University in Utah told the Journal of Marriage and Family.
They are more likely to cook and eat healthier meals together, for instance, rather than one storming off to the pub or staying late at work eating junk food.
Less stress means they sleep better, and if they get on they will encourage each other to drop bad habits, such as smoking, and to keep doctors appointments, for example. Also, when couples get on they do other things together such as sport or other beneficial outdoor activities. - Daily Mail
Source: IOL Lifestyle
Aspartame accounts for more reports of adverse reactions than all other foods and additives combined?
By Dr. Joseph Mercola
Aspartame -- best known by the names of Nutrasweet and Equal -- is believed to be carcinogenic and accounts for more reports of adverse reactions than all other foods and food additives combined.
Yet, this artificial sweetener continues to be used in more than 6,000 products (often sugar-free or "diet" versions), and millions of people consume this toxic chemical daily, believing it to be a healthy alternative to sugar.
If you’re one of them, or know someone who is, watching the 90-minute documentary Sweet Misery, above, could literally save your life. You might find you have something in common with film maker and narrator Cori Brackett’s own personal story, which starts out the film.
Like many others, Cori noticed a connection between the diet sodas she was drinking and negative effects on her health, including double vision, slurred speech and weak limbs. She was even diagnosed with multiple sclerosis and forced to use a wheelchair.
When she learned of aspartame’s link to the health issues described, she stopped using them and, as if by magic, her symptoms disappeared. But this is only the start of the incredibly eye-opening story behind aspartame, revealed in full detail in Sweet Misery.
Aspartame is the number one source of side-effect complaints to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), with over 10,000 complaints filed and over 91 symptoms documented that are related to its consumption. With that many reports of adverse effects, it's hard to believe aspartame is still allowed on the market — let alone being weaseled in as an unlabeled ingredient in dairy products of all kinds.
Unfortunately, aspartame's approval was and still is largely a political affair. Many readers have long forgotten what 60 Minutes' correspondent Mike Wallace stated in his 1996 report on aspartame — that the approval of aspartame was "the most contested in FDA history." And for good reason. At the time, independent studies had found it caused brain cancer in lab animals, and the studies submitted by G.D. Searle to the FDA for the approval were quickly suspected of being sloppy at best. To get an idea of of how aspartame made it through the FDA approval process despite warning signs of potential health hazards and alleged scientific fraud, take a look at the historical timeline of aspartame
A number of studies have already shown that consuming artificial sweeteners disassociates the sensation of sweetness with caloric content, thereby changing your body's ability to regulate caloric intake naturally. So if you’re consuming artificial sweeteners because you think they’re going to help you lose weight, think again. In all, about 90 different adverse effects have been linked to aspartame
Story at-a-glance
Read the full article and watch the video at: http://tinyurl.com/qbfyzx9
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
Aspartame -- best known by the names of Nutrasweet and Equal -- is believed to be carcinogenic and accounts for more reports of adverse reactions than all other foods and food additives combined.
Yet, this artificial sweetener continues to be used in more than 6,000 products (often sugar-free or "diet" versions), and millions of people consume this toxic chemical daily, believing it to be a healthy alternative to sugar.
If you’re one of them, or know someone who is, watching the 90-minute documentary Sweet Misery, above, could literally save your life. You might find you have something in common with film maker and narrator Cori Brackett’s own personal story, which starts out the film.
Like many others, Cori noticed a connection between the diet sodas she was drinking and negative effects on her health, including double vision, slurred speech and weak limbs. She was even diagnosed with multiple sclerosis and forced to use a wheelchair.
When she learned of aspartame’s link to the health issues described, she stopped using them and, as if by magic, her symptoms disappeared. But this is only the start of the incredibly eye-opening story behind aspartame, revealed in full detail in Sweet Misery.
Aspartame is the number one source of side-effect complaints to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), with over 10,000 complaints filed and over 91 symptoms documented that are related to its consumption. With that many reports of adverse effects, it's hard to believe aspartame is still allowed on the market — let alone being weaseled in as an unlabeled ingredient in dairy products of all kinds.
Unfortunately, aspartame's approval was and still is largely a political affair. Many readers have long forgotten what 60 Minutes' correspondent Mike Wallace stated in his 1996 report on aspartame — that the approval of aspartame was "the most contested in FDA history." And for good reason. At the time, independent studies had found it caused brain cancer in lab animals, and the studies submitted by G.D. Searle to the FDA for the approval were quickly suspected of being sloppy at best. To get an idea of of how aspartame made it through the FDA approval process despite warning signs of potential health hazards and alleged scientific fraud, take a look at the historical timeline of aspartame
A number of studies have already shown that consuming artificial sweeteners disassociates the sensation of sweetness with caloric content, thereby changing your body's ability to regulate caloric intake naturally. So if you’re consuming artificial sweeteners because you think they’re going to help you lose weight, think again. In all, about 90 different adverse effects have been linked to aspartame
Story at-a-glance
- The documentary Sweet Misery tells the whole story about aspartame, from its astounding list of related adverse health effects to the corporate fraud and manipulation surrounding its approval
- Sweet Misery includes heartfelt conversations with aspartame victims and shocking evidence showing how aspartame made it through the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval process despite clear warning signs of potential health hazards and alleged scientific fraud
- Aspartame accounts for more reports of adverse reactions than all other foods and food additives combined
- About 90 different adverse health effects, from migraines and seizures to blood cancer and weight gain, have been linked to aspartame consumption
Read the full article and watch the video at: http://tinyurl.com/qbfyzx9
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
Prescription Drug Overdose Deaths Spike Among Middle-Aged Women
(USA Today) More women are dying from prescription painkiller overdoses than ever before, highlighting what the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention calls a growing public health epidemic.
The CDC study shows that while men are still more likely to die of overdoses, the number of deaths among women increased five-fold in the last decade, four times more than deaths in women from cocaine and heroin combined, says CDC director Tom Frieden. About 12% of these deaths were suicides, CDC experts said.
The rate of prescription drug overdose deaths of women increased 400% from 1999 to 2010, compared with an increase of 250% for men. More men die of prescription painkiller overdoses — about 23,000 in 2010, compared with 15,300 for women.
Read the full article at: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/07/02/drug-overdose-deaths-women/2483169/
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
The CDC study shows that while men are still more likely to die of overdoses, the number of deaths among women increased five-fold in the last decade, four times more than deaths in women from cocaine and heroin combined, says CDC director Tom Frieden. About 12% of these deaths were suicides, CDC experts said.
The rate of prescription drug overdose deaths of women increased 400% from 1999 to 2010, compared with an increase of 250% for men. More men die of prescription painkiller overdoses — about 23,000 in 2010, compared with 15,300 for women.
Read the full article at: http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/07/02/drug-overdose-deaths-women/2483169/
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
University of British Colombia’s (UBC) Doctors Expose Vaccination Cover-up
Dr Chris Shaw, from the University of British Colombia’s (UBC) Department of Ophthalmology, Visual Sciences, Experimental Medicine and Neuroscience published a paper in the Journal Inorganic Biochemistry along with his colleague, Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic that revealed Government experts have known about the dangers associated with vaccinations. They investigated information exposing a 30 year scandal of official meetings by UK government vaccine committees and independent medical ‘experts’ with drug industry connections. The paper is at the bottom of the article under “sources”.
A Freedom of Information Act request filed with the CDC seeking information on what the CDC knows about the dangers of vaccines, had by law to be responded to in 20 days. Nearly 7 years later a judge ordered the CDC to turn over the documents on September 30th, 2011. These documents were part of the study discussed in this article.
The paper has received a lot of attention. UBC even held a symposium about vaccination safety as a result in an effort to arouse more critical thinking and discussion around the topic. The response was disturbing with a number of UBC professors upset that the discussion was taking place in the first place. It’s disturbing to know that there are those out there who wish to silence an opposition to vaccination, and not even keep an open mind to potential dangers. Much of the medical literature examined by researchers comes straight from pharmaceutical company-sponsored medical research. It’s time for us to wake up and make some obvious connections. Here is a quote from the published, peer reviewed paper.
Deliberately concealing information from parents for the sole purpose of getting them to comply with an “official” vaccination schedule could be considered as a form of ethical violation or misconduct. Official documents obtained from the UK Department of Health (DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program (1).
The documents reveal that vaccinations don’t work, and that they cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They also indicate scientific fraud, that government ‘experts’ are working to conceal information. The 45 page paper was published in 2011 and presented at the BSEM scientific conference (2).
Here I present the documentation which appears to show that the JCVI made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for “herd immunity”, a concept which with regards to vaccination, and contrary to prevalent beliefs, does not rest on solid scientific evidence as will be explained. As a result of such vaccination policy promoted by the JCVI and the DH, many children have been vaccinated without their parents being disclosed the critical information about demonstrated risks of serious adverse reactions, one that the JCVI appeared to have been fully aware of. It would also appear that, by withholding this information, the JCVI/DH neglected the right of individuals to make an informed consent concerning vaccination. By doing so, the JCVI/DH may have violated not only International Guidelines for Medical Ethics. – Dr Lucija Tomljenovic (1)
She also mentions evidence of ties between vaccine manufacturers and pharmaceutical companies.
The transcripts of the JCVI meetings also show that some of the Committee members had extensive ties to pharmaceutical companies and that the JCVI frequently co-operated with vaccine manufacturers on strategies aimed at boosting vaccine uptake. Some of the meetings at which such controversial items were discussed were not intended to be publicly available, as the transcripts were only released later, through the Freedom of Information Act (FOI). These particular meetings are denoted in the transcripts as “commercial in confidence”, and reveal a clear and disturbing lack of transparency, as some of the information was removed from the text (i.e., the names of the participants) prior to transcript release under the FOI section at the JCVI website – Dr Lucija Tomljenovic (1)
The documents go on to show that when strong evidence was presented against vaccination, they were completely ignored and overlooked by the Joint Committee on Vaccinations and Immunizations. Furthermore, the committee has constantly dismissed independent research and downplayed vaccine concerns while over inflating the benefits. They’ve also promoted and elaborated a plan for introducing new vaccines of questionable efficacy and safety into the routine pediatric schedule, on the assumption that the licenses would eventually be granted. All of these violate the JCVI’s own code of conduct.
Alternative media outlets continue to raise awareness about vaccinations and their potential dangers. With the world handing over credibility to a certain criteria, we thank all of the researchers out there who continue to examine all information, and a wide variety of sources. With the work of these researchers and doctors, the truth about vaccinations continues to spread across the planet.
For more articles about vaccinations, you can browse through our health, science/tech, and alternative news sections. Thank you for reading and spread the word!
Sources:
University of BC Doctors Expose Vaccination Cover-up: Official Documents Released From The UK
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/05/21/university-of-bc-doctors-expose-vaccination-coverup-official-documents-released-from-the-uk/
The vaccination policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI): are they at odds?
(1) http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf
The Health Hazards of Disease Prevention - BSEM Scientific Conference Proceedings
(2) http://www.ecomed.org.uk/publications/the-health-hazards-of-disease-prevention
Responses to UBC vaccine paper a problem for free scientific inquiry and expression
http://www.vancourier.com/Responses+vaccine+paper+problem+free+scientific+inquiry+expression/6073466/story.html
The Vaccine Hoax is Over. Documents from UK reveal 30 Years of Coverup
http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/10/the-vaccine-hoax-is-over-freedom-of-information-act-documents-from-uk-reveal-30-years-of-coverup/
30 Years of Secret Official Transcripts Show UK Government Experts Cover Up Vaccine Hazards To Sell More Vaccines And Harm Your Kids
http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2012/03/14/government-experts-cover-up-vaccine-hazards/
Article Source: http://worldtruth.tv/university-of-bc-doctors-expose-vaccination-cover-up/
Further Reading:
Secret Documents Reveal Shocking Truth About Vaccines
http://www.drjpprinsloo.blogspot.com/2013/04/secret-documents-reveal-shocking-truth.html
“Vaccination programs were instituted in the late 1930s… In the 1940s a new mental syndrome which Dr. Leo Kanner called autism ,was noted. It appeared in the wake of the U.S. pertussis vaccine schemes. When vaccination programs were expanded after the war, the number of autistic children increased greatly… (When) the U.S. occupied Japan and forcibly vaccinated the children: their first case of autism was diagnosed in 1945. In England the shot was subject to large scale promotion in the late fifties: a society for autistic children was founded in 1962. In the U.S. at first the malady was noticed in higher income families. This was before the free or forced pertussis vaccine programmes; only the better-off parents could afford the ‘latest medical advance’ later…parents from across the socio-economic spectrum gained equal access… Thus, autistic children were now being discovered within every kind of family and in dreadfully greater numbers than ever before imagined.” - Harris Coulter PhD, Medical Historian, Author of several books on vaccination
UBC researchers advocate HPV vaccine scrutiny
http://www.straight.com/life/ubc-researchers-advocate-hpv-vaccine-scrutiny
Immortal Cancer
This is a good article about the work of Dr Shaw & Dr Tomljenovic, who promote scrutiny and informed decisions
http://jenniferlake.wordpress.com/?s=immortal+cancer
How safe are sanofi pasteur’s vaccines?
http://brabantvsp.wordpress.com/2013/05/16/how-safe-are-sanofi-pasteurs-vaccines/
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
A Freedom of Information Act request filed with the CDC seeking information on what the CDC knows about the dangers of vaccines, had by law to be responded to in 20 days. Nearly 7 years later a judge ordered the CDC to turn over the documents on September 30th, 2011. These documents were part of the study discussed in this article.
The paper has received a lot of attention. UBC even held a symposium about vaccination safety as a result in an effort to arouse more critical thinking and discussion around the topic. The response was disturbing with a number of UBC professors upset that the discussion was taking place in the first place. It’s disturbing to know that there are those out there who wish to silence an opposition to vaccination, and not even keep an open mind to potential dangers. Much of the medical literature examined by researchers comes straight from pharmaceutical company-sponsored medical research. It’s time for us to wake up and make some obvious connections. Here is a quote from the published, peer reviewed paper.
Deliberately concealing information from parents for the sole purpose of getting them to comply with an “official” vaccination schedule could be considered as a form of ethical violation or misconduct. Official documents obtained from the UK Department of Health (DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program (1).
The documents reveal that vaccinations don’t work, and that they cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They also indicate scientific fraud, that government ‘experts’ are working to conceal information. The 45 page paper was published in 2011 and presented at the BSEM scientific conference (2).
Here I present the documentation which appears to show that the JCVI made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for “herd immunity”, a concept which with regards to vaccination, and contrary to prevalent beliefs, does not rest on solid scientific evidence as will be explained. As a result of such vaccination policy promoted by the JCVI and the DH, many children have been vaccinated without their parents being disclosed the critical information about demonstrated risks of serious adverse reactions, one that the JCVI appeared to have been fully aware of. It would also appear that, by withholding this information, the JCVI/DH neglected the right of individuals to make an informed consent concerning vaccination. By doing so, the JCVI/DH may have violated not only International Guidelines for Medical Ethics. – Dr Lucija Tomljenovic (1)
She also mentions evidence of ties between vaccine manufacturers and pharmaceutical companies.
The transcripts of the JCVI meetings also show that some of the Committee members had extensive ties to pharmaceutical companies and that the JCVI frequently co-operated with vaccine manufacturers on strategies aimed at boosting vaccine uptake. Some of the meetings at which such controversial items were discussed were not intended to be publicly available, as the transcripts were only released later, through the Freedom of Information Act (FOI). These particular meetings are denoted in the transcripts as “commercial in confidence”, and reveal a clear and disturbing lack of transparency, as some of the information was removed from the text (i.e., the names of the participants) prior to transcript release under the FOI section at the JCVI website – Dr Lucija Tomljenovic (1)
The documents go on to show that when strong evidence was presented against vaccination, they were completely ignored and overlooked by the Joint Committee on Vaccinations and Immunizations. Furthermore, the committee has constantly dismissed independent research and downplayed vaccine concerns while over inflating the benefits. They’ve also promoted and elaborated a plan for introducing new vaccines of questionable efficacy and safety into the routine pediatric schedule, on the assumption that the licenses would eventually be granted. All of these violate the JCVI’s own code of conduct.
Alternative media outlets continue to raise awareness about vaccinations and their potential dangers. With the world handing over credibility to a certain criteria, we thank all of the researchers out there who continue to examine all information, and a wide variety of sources. With the work of these researchers and doctors, the truth about vaccinations continues to spread across the planet.
For more articles about vaccinations, you can browse through our health, science/tech, and alternative news sections. Thank you for reading and spread the word!
Sources:
University of BC Doctors Expose Vaccination Cover-up: Official Documents Released From The UK
http://www.collective-evolution.com/2013/05/21/university-of-bc-doctors-expose-vaccination-coverup-official-documents-released-from-the-uk/
The vaccination policy and the Code of Practice of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI): are they at odds?
(1) http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf
The Health Hazards of Disease Prevention - BSEM Scientific Conference Proceedings
(2) http://www.ecomed.org.uk/publications/the-health-hazards-of-disease-prevention
Responses to UBC vaccine paper a problem for free scientific inquiry and expression
http://www.vancourier.com/Responses+vaccine+paper+problem+free+scientific+inquiry+expression/6073466/story.html
The Vaccine Hoax is Over. Documents from UK reveal 30 Years of Coverup
http://nsnbc.me/2013/05/10/the-vaccine-hoax-is-over-freedom-of-information-act-documents-from-uk-reveal-30-years-of-coverup/
30 Years of Secret Official Transcripts Show UK Government Experts Cover Up Vaccine Hazards To Sell More Vaccines And Harm Your Kids
http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2012/03/14/government-experts-cover-up-vaccine-hazards/
Article Source: http://worldtruth.tv/university-of-bc-doctors-expose-vaccination-cover-up/
Further Reading:
Secret Documents Reveal Shocking Truth About Vaccines
http://www.drjpprinsloo.blogspot.com/2013/04/secret-documents-reveal-shocking-truth.html
“Vaccination programs were instituted in the late 1930s… In the 1940s a new mental syndrome which Dr. Leo Kanner called autism ,was noted. It appeared in the wake of the U.S. pertussis vaccine schemes. When vaccination programs were expanded after the war, the number of autistic children increased greatly… (When) the U.S. occupied Japan and forcibly vaccinated the children: their first case of autism was diagnosed in 1945. In England the shot was subject to large scale promotion in the late fifties: a society for autistic children was founded in 1962. In the U.S. at first the malady was noticed in higher income families. This was before the free or forced pertussis vaccine programmes; only the better-off parents could afford the ‘latest medical advance’ later…parents from across the socio-economic spectrum gained equal access… Thus, autistic children were now being discovered within every kind of family and in dreadfully greater numbers than ever before imagined.” - Harris Coulter PhD, Medical Historian, Author of several books on vaccination
UBC researchers advocate HPV vaccine scrutiny
http://www.straight.com/life/ubc-researchers-advocate-hpv-vaccine-scrutiny
Immortal Cancer
This is a good article about the work of Dr Shaw & Dr Tomljenovic, who promote scrutiny and informed decisions
http://jenniferlake.wordpress.com/?s=immortal+cancer
How safe are sanofi pasteur’s vaccines?
http://brabantvsp.wordpress.com/2013/05/16/how-safe-are-sanofi-pasteurs-vaccines/
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
Saturday, 6 July 2013
Your Child's Brain Development
Everything children hear, see, feel and smell contributes to their healthy brain growth and development. The human brain changes more in the first 3 years of life than every other year combined in the human life span.
Friday, 5 July 2013
Still Using Tampons Or Pads? Think again!
The Tampon and Pad industry is a $718 Million dollar market, and tampons and pads are necessities. This got me questioning the production and ethical value behind these products. Think about it, If an average women uses about 17,000 pads or tampons during her entire menstruation period, x that by 3.5 billion women in the world, and yeah, you do the math….
They are mass-produced, and heavily marketed and cheaply made, out of bleached rayon and plastics. Why is it that we never see ads for the much safer alternatives such as cotton products, reusable washable pads and menstruation cups? Any of these alternatives are much more economical and are about a gillion times safer.
Almost all sanitary napkins and tampons are made with bleached rayon, cotton and plastics, how safe do you think that material is to be inside or very close to your Vagina? Not to mention these products leave behind fibers in your vagina that can cause bladder, vaginal infections, and Toxic Shock Syndrome. Tampons are also known to absorb the natural fluids and bacteria’s that the vagina produces to stay clean and healthy.
Let’s look at the #1 ingredient in generic tampons and sanitary napkins: Rayon. Rayon is a fiber that is made from cellulose fibers, cellulose is a natural fiber, but to produce Rayon chemical procedures are needed that include: carbon disulphide, sulfuric acid, chlorine and caustic soda.
Side effects from exposure to too much Rayon can include: nausea, vomiting, chest pain, headaches and many others. Rayon is not just found in tampons and pads, but a lot of clothes are made from it as well. Sanitary napkins also contain quite a bit of plastic, which does not allow sufficient air flow ‘down there’ so in turn can also cause an array of infections. Tampons and pads are also bleached using chlorine, which results in the production of dioxin, which is linked to breast cancer, endometriosis, immune system suppression and various other ailments.
Read the full article at : http://www.whydontyoutrythis.com/2013/07/still-using-tampons-or-pads-you-should-read-this.html
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease, infertility and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic infertility treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/infertility_homeopathy.html
They are mass-produced, and heavily marketed and cheaply made, out of bleached rayon and plastics. Why is it that we never see ads for the much safer alternatives such as cotton products, reusable washable pads and menstruation cups? Any of these alternatives are much more economical and are about a gillion times safer.
Almost all sanitary napkins and tampons are made with bleached rayon, cotton and plastics, how safe do you think that material is to be inside or very close to your Vagina? Not to mention these products leave behind fibers in your vagina that can cause bladder, vaginal infections, and Toxic Shock Syndrome. Tampons are also known to absorb the natural fluids and bacteria’s that the vagina produces to stay clean and healthy.
Let’s look at the #1 ingredient in generic tampons and sanitary napkins: Rayon. Rayon is a fiber that is made from cellulose fibers, cellulose is a natural fiber, but to produce Rayon chemical procedures are needed that include: carbon disulphide, sulfuric acid, chlorine and caustic soda.
Side effects from exposure to too much Rayon can include: nausea, vomiting, chest pain, headaches and many others. Rayon is not just found in tampons and pads, but a lot of clothes are made from it as well. Sanitary napkins also contain quite a bit of plastic, which does not allow sufficient air flow ‘down there’ so in turn can also cause an array of infections. Tampons and pads are also bleached using chlorine, which results in the production of dioxin, which is linked to breast cancer, endometriosis, immune system suppression and various other ailments.
Read the full article at : http://www.whydontyoutrythis.com/2013/07/still-using-tampons-or-pads-you-should-read-this.html
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease, infertility and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic infertility treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/infertility_homeopathy.html
Wednesday, 3 July 2013
Heart risk warning over painkiller diclofenac
People with heart problems have been advised to stop using one of the most commonly prescribed anti-inflammatory drugs in the UK.
The medicines regulator said painkiller diclofenac could significantly increase the risk of a heart attack or stroke for some patients.
The advice has been updated after a European review of the risks.
Millions of people take diclofenac for a range of conditions including headaches, back pain and arthritis.
The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) said the drug should not be used by people with serious underlying heart conditions.
This is a measured response by the MHRA to data that have accumulated over many years.
People who have suffered heart failure, heart disease or a stroke should stop using it completely.
Smokers and people with high blood pressure, raised cholesterol and diabetes have been advised to use the drug only after consulting their GP or pharmacist.
The MHRA said diclofenac would continue to provide safe and effective pain relief, apart from patients in certain "at risk" groups.
Dr Sarah Branch, deputy director of the MHRA's vigilance and risk management of medicines division, said: "Whilst this is a known risk and warnings have been included in patient and healthcare information for some time, this advice is now being updated."
Six million prescriptions were written for diclofenac last year and the drug is also available over the counter.
Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-23109314
Dr. WC Douglass' warnings on diclofenac dates back a long way
In February 2007 already, Dr. WC Douglass wrote "The heart travails associated with diclofenac are well known and documented."
Pop a painkiller, drop dead
February 4, 2011
Popular painkiller linked to heart and stroke risk
Feelin’ lucky? Then go ahead — pop that painkiller.
But you’d better hope that today’s not the day your luck finally runs out, because some of the most commonly used pain meds carry a major death risk.
The drugs are those nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories used by millions for everything from arthritis to headaches to back pain. And now, researchers say they can double, triple, and even quadruple your odds of heart attack, stroke, and an early death.
Swiss researchers looked at data from 31 “gold-standard” trials that included 116,429 patients, and found that ibuprofen — a med probably in your own home right now — can triple the risk of stroke.
And diclofenac, a widely used generic prescription NSAID, can quadruple the risk of death from heart attack and stroke.
These problems aren’t rare by any stretch. In fact, the researchers say that for every 25 to 50 patients who take NSAIDs for a year, there will be one extra heart attack or stroke.
That’s overall.
But they also believe that patients who already have heart problems could face a much higher risk when they pop those pills — like the millions of seniors who battle both heart disease and arthritis.
The researchers found naproxen (aka Aleve) to be the “safest” of the NSAIDs, but don’t kid yourself — “safest” doesn’t mean “safe.” All painkillers carry risk — and regular use of any NSAID can lead to bleeding problems, ulcers, and more.
And that means you need to be careful with how — and how often — you use these things, no matter how old you are or what risks you face.
If you need one from time to time, you need one — and I won’t stand in your way.
But if you’re taking one of these things regularly, there’s clearly something else going on — and you and your doc need to get to the bottom of it.
If you go looking for that answer at the bottom of a painkiller jar, you could find yourself at the bottom of a grave.
Source: http://douglassreport.com/2011/02/04/pop-a-painkiller/
Common painkillers boost heart attack risk
June 12, 2011
There’s never a great time to take a painkiller — but there’s one time in particular you really want to play “keep away” with these risky meds.
And that’s after a heart attack.
According to a study published in Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association, some of the world’s most commonly used painkillers — non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs — can dramatically boost the odds of a second heart attack or even death within days of taking them.
Danish researchers looked at data on 83,677 heart attack patients, 42.3 percent of whom had been given NSAIDs. Overall, they found that heart attack survivors given NSAIDs were 45 percent more likely to have a second attack or die inside of a single week.
And within 90 days, the risk increased by 55 percent.
But as deadly as NSAIDs can be, they don’t top the “most dangerous” list. That honor goes to a popular generic arthritis med called diclofenac. Taking this drug after experiencing a heart attack can TRIPLE your odds of death or a second heart attack.
If you want to protect your heart and reduce the inflammation behind everything from pain to disease, stock up on cod liver oil or a quality omega-3 fatty acid supplement.
And whether you’re recovering from a heart attack or a stubbed toe, save the painkillers for only real, severe pain.
Source: http://douglassreport.com/2011/06/12/painkillers-boost-heart-attacks/
Painkiller drug diclofenac 'overused' despite heart risk
A painkiller that increases the risk of heart attack and stroke may be overprescribed, researchers say.
The dark side of medical marketing
April 22, 2013
If there’s anyone shadier than a used-car salesman, it’s a Big Pharma drug rep.
But at least when a car salesman lies, the worst that could happen is you get stuck with a lemon.
When drug reps lie, people DIE — and yes, this sadly happens all the time.
One new survey of drug promotions in the United States, Canada, and France finds that just six percent of Big Pharma’s minions ever bother to mention side effects or other serious risks.
Six percent!
Now, it would be one thing if the drugs in the survey were all safe (if there was such a thing) or even safe-ish. But a full 57 percent are so dangerous they have government-mandated warning labels such as the FDA’s infamous black box.
This isn’t just unethical and disgraceful. It isn’t even just deceitful and potentially deadly…
It’s ILLEGAL.
All three nations in the survey have laws requiring that drug presentations include information on risks — yet Big Pharma is clearly doing what it always has when confronted with laws they don’t like.
Ignoring them!
Don’t expect your doc to drop a dime and turn them in either. He’s too busy collecting Big Pharma handouts to pay attention. Some docs can be had for the price of lunch. Others collect cold, hard cash — in the form of “consulting fees,” of course.
In return, they do exactly as they’re told — because the survey also finds that docs start prescribing the drugs in question right after those woefully incomplete sales presentations.
And that means the only person you can depend on to look after your interests — besides me, of course — is YOU.
When you get handed a prescription for a drug, do the work your doctor won’t and investigate it. Find out if it’s safe. Find out if it’s effective. Find out if it’s necessary.
More importantly, find out what your other options are. (We can help with that. A quick search of our online archives here can help you find effective natural solutions.)
And if it comes down to it, find a new doctor — one who’s not tucked away in Big Pharma’s back pocket. I recommend one of the experienced members of the American College for Advancement in Medicine.
Source: http://douglassreport.com/2013/04/22/no-surprise-big-pharma/
Read more about diclofenac
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diclofenac
Drugs.com
http://www.drugs.com/diclofenac.html
"Diclofenac may increase your risk of heart attack or stroke, especially if you use it long term or have heart disease. Do not use this medicine just before or after heart bypass surgery (coronary artery bypass graft, or CABG)."
RxList
http://www.rxlist.com/voltaren-drug.htm
NSAIDs may cause an increased risk of serious cardiovascular thrombotic events, myocardial infarction, and stroke, which can be fatal. This risk may increase with duration of use. Patients with cardiovascular disease or risk factors for cardiovascular disease may be at greater risk. (See WARNINGS.)
Voltaren® (diclofenac sodium enteric-coated tablets) is contraindicated for the treatment of perioperative pain in the setting of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery (see WARNINGS).
MedlinePlus
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/meds/a689002.html
"People who take nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (other than aspirin) such as diclofenac may have a higher risk of having a heart attack or a stroke than people who do not take these medications. These events may happen without warning and may cause death. This risk may be higher for people who take NSAIDs for a long time. Tell your doctor if you or anyone in your family has or has ever had heart disease, a heart attack, or a stroke, if you smoke, and if you have or have ever had high cholesterol, high blood pressure, or diabetes. Get emergency medical help right away if you experience any of the following symptoms: chest pain, shortness of breath, weakness in one part or side of the body, or slurred speech.
If you will be undergoing a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG; a type of heart surgery), you should not take diclofenac right before or right after the surgery."
Painkiller drug diclofenac 'overused' despite heart risk
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-21410182
A painkiller that increases the risk of heart attack and stroke may be overprescribed, researchers say.
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
The medicines regulator said painkiller diclofenac could significantly increase the risk of a heart attack or stroke for some patients.
The advice has been updated after a European review of the risks.
Millions of people take diclofenac for a range of conditions including headaches, back pain and arthritis.
The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) said the drug should not be used by people with serious underlying heart conditions.
This is a measured response by the MHRA to data that have accumulated over many years.
People who have suffered heart failure, heart disease or a stroke should stop using it completely.
Smokers and people with high blood pressure, raised cholesterol and diabetes have been advised to use the drug only after consulting their GP or pharmacist.
The MHRA said diclofenac would continue to provide safe and effective pain relief, apart from patients in certain "at risk" groups.
Dr Sarah Branch, deputy director of the MHRA's vigilance and risk management of medicines division, said: "Whilst this is a known risk and warnings have been included in patient and healthcare information for some time, this advice is now being updated."
Six million prescriptions were written for diclofenac last year and the drug is also available over the counter.
Source: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-23109314
Dr. WC Douglass' warnings on diclofenac dates back a long way
In February 2007 already, Dr. WC Douglass wrote "The heart travails associated with diclofenac are well known and documented."
Pop a painkiller, drop dead
February 4, 2011
Popular painkiller linked to heart and stroke risk
Feelin’ lucky? Then go ahead — pop that painkiller.
But you’d better hope that today’s not the day your luck finally runs out, because some of the most commonly used pain meds carry a major death risk.
The drugs are those nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories used by millions for everything from arthritis to headaches to back pain. And now, researchers say they can double, triple, and even quadruple your odds of heart attack, stroke, and an early death.
Swiss researchers looked at data from 31 “gold-standard” trials that included 116,429 patients, and found that ibuprofen — a med probably in your own home right now — can triple the risk of stroke.
And diclofenac, a widely used generic prescription NSAID, can quadruple the risk of death from heart attack and stroke.
These problems aren’t rare by any stretch. In fact, the researchers say that for every 25 to 50 patients who take NSAIDs for a year, there will be one extra heart attack or stroke.
That’s overall.
But they also believe that patients who already have heart problems could face a much higher risk when they pop those pills — like the millions of seniors who battle both heart disease and arthritis.
The researchers found naproxen (aka Aleve) to be the “safest” of the NSAIDs, but don’t kid yourself — “safest” doesn’t mean “safe.” All painkillers carry risk — and regular use of any NSAID can lead to bleeding problems, ulcers, and more.
And that means you need to be careful with how — and how often — you use these things, no matter how old you are or what risks you face.
If you need one from time to time, you need one — and I won’t stand in your way.
But if you’re taking one of these things regularly, there’s clearly something else going on — and you and your doc need to get to the bottom of it.
If you go looking for that answer at the bottom of a painkiller jar, you could find yourself at the bottom of a grave.
Source: http://douglassreport.com/2011/02/04/pop-a-painkiller/
Common painkillers boost heart attack risk
June 12, 2011
There’s never a great time to take a painkiller — but there’s one time in particular you really want to play “keep away” with these risky meds.
And that’s after a heart attack.
According to a study published in Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association, some of the world’s most commonly used painkillers — non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs — can dramatically boost the odds of a second heart attack or even death within days of taking them.
Danish researchers looked at data on 83,677 heart attack patients, 42.3 percent of whom had been given NSAIDs. Overall, they found that heart attack survivors given NSAIDs were 45 percent more likely to have a second attack or die inside of a single week.
And within 90 days, the risk increased by 55 percent.
But as deadly as NSAIDs can be, they don’t top the “most dangerous” list. That honor goes to a popular generic arthritis med called diclofenac. Taking this drug after experiencing a heart attack can TRIPLE your odds of death or a second heart attack.
If you want to protect your heart and reduce the inflammation behind everything from pain to disease, stock up on cod liver oil or a quality omega-3 fatty acid supplement.
And whether you’re recovering from a heart attack or a stubbed toe, save the painkillers for only real, severe pain.
Source: http://douglassreport.com/2011/06/12/painkillers-boost-heart-attacks/
Painkiller drug diclofenac 'overused' despite heart risk
A painkiller that increases the risk of heart attack and stroke may be overprescribed, researchers say.
The dark side of medical marketing
April 22, 2013
If there’s anyone shadier than a used-car salesman, it’s a Big Pharma drug rep.
But at least when a car salesman lies, the worst that could happen is you get stuck with a lemon.
When drug reps lie, people DIE — and yes, this sadly happens all the time.
One new survey of drug promotions in the United States, Canada, and France finds that just six percent of Big Pharma’s minions ever bother to mention side effects or other serious risks.
Six percent!
Now, it would be one thing if the drugs in the survey were all safe (if there was such a thing) or even safe-ish. But a full 57 percent are so dangerous they have government-mandated warning labels such as the FDA’s infamous black box.
This isn’t just unethical and disgraceful. It isn’t even just deceitful and potentially deadly…
It’s ILLEGAL.
All three nations in the survey have laws requiring that drug presentations include information on risks — yet Big Pharma is clearly doing what it always has when confronted with laws they don’t like.
Ignoring them!
Don’t expect your doc to drop a dime and turn them in either. He’s too busy collecting Big Pharma handouts to pay attention. Some docs can be had for the price of lunch. Others collect cold, hard cash — in the form of “consulting fees,” of course.
In return, they do exactly as they’re told — because the survey also finds that docs start prescribing the drugs in question right after those woefully incomplete sales presentations.
And that means the only person you can depend on to look after your interests — besides me, of course — is YOU.
When you get handed a prescription for a drug, do the work your doctor won’t and investigate it. Find out if it’s safe. Find out if it’s effective. Find out if it’s necessary.
More importantly, find out what your other options are. (We can help with that. A quick search of our online archives here can help you find effective natural solutions.)
And if it comes down to it, find a new doctor — one who’s not tucked away in Big Pharma’s back pocket. I recommend one of the experienced members of the American College for Advancement in Medicine.
Source: http://douglassreport.com/2013/04/22/no-surprise-big-pharma/
Read more about diclofenac
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diclofenac
Drugs.com
http://www.drugs.com/diclofenac.html
"Diclofenac may increase your risk of heart attack or stroke, especially if you use it long term or have heart disease. Do not use this medicine just before or after heart bypass surgery (coronary artery bypass graft, or CABG)."
RxList
http://www.rxlist.com/voltaren-drug.htm
NSAIDs may cause an increased risk of serious cardiovascular thrombotic events, myocardial infarction, and stroke, which can be fatal. This risk may increase with duration of use. Patients with cardiovascular disease or risk factors for cardiovascular disease may be at greater risk. (See WARNINGS.)
Voltaren® (diclofenac sodium enteric-coated tablets) is contraindicated for the treatment of perioperative pain in the setting of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery (see WARNINGS).
MedlinePlus
http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/druginfo/meds/a689002.html
"People who take nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (other than aspirin) such as diclofenac may have a higher risk of having a heart attack or a stroke than people who do not take these medications. These events may happen without warning and may cause death. This risk may be higher for people who take NSAIDs for a long time. Tell your doctor if you or anyone in your family has or has ever had heart disease, a heart attack, or a stroke, if you smoke, and if you have or have ever had high cholesterol, high blood pressure, or diabetes. Get emergency medical help right away if you experience any of the following symptoms: chest pain, shortness of breath, weakness in one part or side of the body, or slurred speech.
If you will be undergoing a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG; a type of heart surgery), you should not take diclofenac right before or right after the surgery."
Painkiller drug diclofenac 'overused' despite heart risk
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-21410182
A painkiller that increases the risk of heart attack and stroke may be overprescribed, researchers say.
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
Wednesday, 19 June 2013
Associations of Sugar and Artificially Sweetened Soda with Albuminuria and Kidney Function Decline in Women
Julie Lin and Gary C. Curhan
This study identified 3318 women participating in the Nurses' Health Study with data on soda intake and albuminuria
Results
Consumption of ≥2 servings per day of artificially sweetened (diet) soda was independently associated with eGFR decline ≥30% (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.01) and ≥3 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.55). No increased risk for eGFR decline was observed for <2 servings per day of diet soda. No associations were noted between diet soda and MA or sugar soda and MA or eGFR decline.
Discussion
Our results did not confirm the previously reported association between sugar soda and albuminuria, but we report a novel finding that ≥2 servings per day of artificially sweetened soda was associated with faster kidney function decline.
The observed association between diet soda and faster kidney function decline was not an a priori hypothesis and may be subject to incomplete adjustment for confounding despite our efforts in constructing additional models that included nutrients, foods, and diet quality. We would also emphasize that causality cannot be established from an analysis of an observational cohort study, and that higher consumption of diet soda may be a marker of unmeasured characteristics that put women at higher risk for progressive kidney function decline.
However, if there is a causal association, we cannot determine if there is a specific type of artificial sweetener that may be associated with kidney function decline or even if it is an artificial sweetener or another ingredient in diet soda not found in sugar soda. Aspartame and saccharin were the primary artificial sweeteners used in carbonated low-calorie soft drinks in the 1980s and 1990s (The following popper user interface control may not be accessible. Tab to the next button to revert the control to an accessible version.Destroy user interface control29), which pertain to the years assessed by the FFQs used for the kidney function decline analyses.
In summary, ≥2 servings per day of artificially sweetened soda was significantly associated with faster kidney function decline in older women with preserved kidney function. In light of the documented increase in soft drink consumption across all age groups between 1977 and 2001 (The following popper user interface control may not be accessible. Tab to the next button to revert the control to an accessible version.Destroy user interface control32), this finding generates a new hypothesis about diet soda and renal decline and has potential important public health implications if further research can establish the generalizability of this finding in men and non-whites as well as a causal relationship between artificially sweetened soda and kidney function decline.
Conclusions
Consumption of ≥2 servings per day of artificially sweetened soda is associated with a 2-fold increased odds for kidney function decline in women.
Read the full publication at : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022238/
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
This study identified 3318 women participating in the Nurses' Health Study with data on soda intake and albuminuria
Results
Consumption of ≥2 servings per day of artificially sweetened (diet) soda was independently associated with eGFR decline ≥30% (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.01) and ≥3 ml/min per 1.73 m2 per year (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.36 to 3.55). No increased risk for eGFR decline was observed for <2 servings per day of diet soda. No associations were noted between diet soda and MA or sugar soda and MA or eGFR decline.
Discussion
Our results did not confirm the previously reported association between sugar soda and albuminuria, but we report a novel finding that ≥2 servings per day of artificially sweetened soda was associated with faster kidney function decline.
The observed association between diet soda and faster kidney function decline was not an a priori hypothesis and may be subject to incomplete adjustment for confounding despite our efforts in constructing additional models that included nutrients, foods, and diet quality. We would also emphasize that causality cannot be established from an analysis of an observational cohort study, and that higher consumption of diet soda may be a marker of unmeasured characteristics that put women at higher risk for progressive kidney function decline.
However, if there is a causal association, we cannot determine if there is a specific type of artificial sweetener that may be associated with kidney function decline or even if it is an artificial sweetener or another ingredient in diet soda not found in sugar soda. Aspartame and saccharin were the primary artificial sweeteners used in carbonated low-calorie soft drinks in the 1980s and 1990s (The following popper user interface control may not be accessible. Tab to the next button to revert the control to an accessible version.Destroy user interface control29), which pertain to the years assessed by the FFQs used for the kidney function decline analyses.
In summary, ≥2 servings per day of artificially sweetened soda was significantly associated with faster kidney function decline in older women with preserved kidney function. In light of the documented increase in soft drink consumption across all age groups between 1977 and 2001 (The following popper user interface control may not be accessible. Tab to the next button to revert the control to an accessible version.Destroy user interface control32), this finding generates a new hypothesis about diet soda and renal decline and has potential important public health implications if further research can establish the generalizability of this finding in men and non-whites as well as a causal relationship between artificially sweetened soda and kidney function decline.
Conclusions
Consumption of ≥2 servings per day of artificially sweetened soda is associated with a 2-fold increased odds for kidney function decline in women.
Read the full publication at : http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3022238/
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
Marijuana Compound Found Superior To Drugs For Alzheimer's
Could the active ingredient in marijuana, responsible for its characteristic "high," help turn the tide against the accelerating Alzheimer's epidemic?
A remarkable study published in the journal Molecular Pharmacology in 2006, found that this long vilified plant contains a compound with not one, but two therapeutic properties ideal for addressing both the surface symptom (memory problems) and root cause (brain plaque) of Alzheimer's disease. This is an ironic finding, considering that the prevailing stereotype is that using marijuana "fries" the brain, leading to debilitating memory issues.
Researchers discovered that the psychoactive component of marijuana, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), both "competitively inhibits the enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE) as well as prevents AChE-induced amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) aggregation."
On the first account, THC's ability to inhibit the AChE enzyme, is not unlike the mechanism of action behind most Alzheimer's drugs on the market today. Drugs like donepezil (trade name Aricept), for instance, by targeting and inhibiting the brain enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE), result in an increase in brain levels of this neurotransmitter, which in turn, results in symptom reduction, i.e. improved memory. Donepezil, however, is riddled with controversy due its well-known association with seizures, which likely reflects its intrinsic neurotoxicity. It is, in fact, a chemical in the same general chemical class as venom, insecticides and chemical war agents, such as nerve gas.
On the second account, THC's ability to prevent the acetylcholinesterase-associated amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) aggregation, i.e. brain plaque, indicates that it may, as the researchers noted, "directly impact Alzheimer's disease pathology." In fact, they found "Compared to currently approved drugs prescribed for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, THC is a considerably superior inhibitor of Aβ aggregation, and this study provides a previously unrecognized molecular mechanism through which cannabinoid molecules may directly impact the progression of this debilitating disease."
What is so encouraging about this research, and which the researchers described as "noteworthy," is the following:
THC, of course, is only one of a wide range of cannabinoids in the plant marijuana. Not only is there already plentiful information on the neuroprotective properties of marijuana compounds, but there is also a sizeable body of clinical and/or biomedical research indicating the medicinal value of this plant in over 150 health conditions. To view this research visit our Medical Marijuana Research page.
Source: Green Med Info
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
A remarkable study published in the journal Molecular Pharmacology in 2006, found that this long vilified plant contains a compound with not one, but two therapeutic properties ideal for addressing both the surface symptom (memory problems) and root cause (brain plaque) of Alzheimer's disease. This is an ironic finding, considering that the prevailing stereotype is that using marijuana "fries" the brain, leading to debilitating memory issues.
Researchers discovered that the psychoactive component of marijuana, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), both "competitively inhibits the enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE) as well as prevents AChE-induced amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) aggregation."
On the first account, THC's ability to inhibit the AChE enzyme, is not unlike the mechanism of action behind most Alzheimer's drugs on the market today. Drugs like donepezil (trade name Aricept), for instance, by targeting and inhibiting the brain enzyme acetylcholinesterase (AChE), result in an increase in brain levels of this neurotransmitter, which in turn, results in symptom reduction, i.e. improved memory. Donepezil, however, is riddled with controversy due its well-known association with seizures, which likely reflects its intrinsic neurotoxicity. It is, in fact, a chemical in the same general chemical class as venom, insecticides and chemical war agents, such as nerve gas.
On the second account, THC's ability to prevent the acetylcholinesterase-associated amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) aggregation, i.e. brain plaque, indicates that it may, as the researchers noted, "directly impact Alzheimer's disease pathology." In fact, they found "Compared to currently approved drugs prescribed for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, THC is a considerably superior inhibitor of Aβ aggregation, and this study provides a previously unrecognized molecular mechanism through which cannabinoid molecules may directly impact the progression of this debilitating disease."
What is so encouraging about this research, and which the researchers described as "noteworthy," is the following:
THC is a considerably more effective inhibitor of AChE-induced Aβ deposition than the approved drugs for Alzheimer's disease treatment, donepezil and tacrine, which reduced Aβ aggregation by only 22% and 7%, respectively, at twice the concentration used in our studies.7 Therefore, AChE inhibitors such as THC and its analogues may provide an improved therapeutic for Alzheimer's disease, augmenting acetylcholine levels by preventing neurotransmitter degradation and reducing Aβ aggregation, thereby simultaneously treating both the symptoms and progression of Alzheimer's disease.
THC, of course, is only one of a wide range of cannabinoids in the plant marijuana. Not only is there already plentiful information on the neuroprotective properties of marijuana compounds, but there is also a sizeable body of clinical and/or biomedical research indicating the medicinal value of this plant in over 150 health conditions. To view this research visit our Medical Marijuana Research page.
Source: Green Med Info
Related:
- The Data is Very Strong: Marijuana Plant Extract Stops Cancers From Spreading
- The Amazing Health Benefits of Juicing Raw Cannabis (Marijuana) Leaves
- The Importance of Drinking Rather Than Smoking Cannabis
- Study Shows Regular Marijuana Users May Be Skinnier with Better Blood Sugar Control
- The Cancer Industry EXPOSED! Ways to Prevent and CURE Cancer
- The Top Five Special Interest Groups Lobbying To Keep Marijuana Illegal
- Hemp Could Free Us From Oil, Prevent Deforestation, Cure Cancer and It's Environmentally Friendly - So Why Is It Illegal?
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
Tuesday, 18 June 2013
The Benefits of a Ketogenic Diet and its Role in Cancer Treatment
By Dr. Mercola
Story at-a-glance
A ketogenic diet calls for eliminating all but non-starchy vegetable carbohydrates, and replacing them with healthy fats and high quality protein.
The premise is that since cancer cells need glucose to thrive, and carbohydrates turn into glucose in your body, then lowering the glucose level in your blood though carb and protein restriction, literally starves the cancer cells into oblivion. Additionally, low protein intake tends to minimize the mTOR pathway that accelerates cell proliferation.
This type of diet, in which you restrict all but non-starchy vegetable carbs and replace them with low to moderate amounts of high quality protein and high amounts of beneficial fat, is what I recommend for everyone, whether you have cancer or not. It’s a diet that will help optimize your weight and all chronic degenerative disease. Eating this way will help you convert from carb burning mode to fat burning.
Dr. Thomas Seyfried is one of the leading pioneer academic researchers in promoting how to treat cancer nutritionally. He’s been teaching neurogenetics and neurochemistry as it relates to cancer treatment at Yale University and Boston College for the past 25 years.
He’s written over 150 peer-reviewed scientific articles and book chapters, and has also published a book, Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management, and Prevention of Cancer.
“We’re not going to make major advances in the management of cancer until it becomes recognized as a metabolic disease. But in order to do that, you have to present a massive counterargument against the gene theory of cancer,” he says.
“One of the key issues here is that if you transplant the nucleus of a cancer cell into a normal cell, you don’t get cancer cells. You can actually get normal tissues and sometimes a whole normal organism from the nucleus of a cancer cell. Now, if the tumors are being driven by driver genes – all these kinds of mutations and things that we hear about – how is it possible that all of this is changed when you place this cancer nucleus into the cytoplasm of a cell with normal mitochondria?
The gene theory cannot address this. It clearly argues strongly against the concept that genes are driving this process. Actually, a very few people inherit genes that predispose them to cancer. Most people inherit genes that prevent cancer. And those few genes that are inherited – the germ line like the BRCA1 mutations, B53, and a few other very rare cancers – these inherited mutations appear to disrupt the function of the mitochondria.”
“When we’re dealing with glucose and [cancer] management, we know from a large number of studies that if respiration of the tumor is ineffective, in order to survive, the cells must use an alternative source of energy, which is fermentation. We know that glucose is the primary fuel for fermentation. Fermentation becomes a primary energy-generating process in the tumor cell. By targeting the fuel for that process, we then have the capability of potentially managing the disease.”
To read the rest of this article click here
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
Story at-a-glance
- A ketogenic diet, which calls for minimizing carbohydrates and replacing them with healthy fats and moderate amounts of high quality protein, can offer hope against cancer, both for prevention and treatment
- Your normal cells have the metabolic flexibility to adapt from using glucose to using ketone bodies. Cancer cells lack this ability so when you reduce carbs to only non-starchy vegetables, you effectively starve the cancer
- Cancer can be more accurately classified as a mitochondrial metabolic disease. Few people inherit genes that predispose them to cancer (most inherit genes that prevent cancer), and inherited mutations typically disrupt the function of the mitochondria
- The mitochondria—the main power generators in your cells—are believed to be the central point in the origins of many cancers. Your mitochondria can be damaged not only by inherited mutations, but also by a wide variety of environmental factors and toxins
- Fasting has remarkable health benefits and strengthens your mitochondria network systems throughout your body. As long as your mitochondria remain healthy and functional, it’s very unlikely that cancer will develop
A ketogenic diet calls for eliminating all but non-starchy vegetable carbohydrates, and replacing them with healthy fats and high quality protein.
The premise is that since cancer cells need glucose to thrive, and carbohydrates turn into glucose in your body, then lowering the glucose level in your blood though carb and protein restriction, literally starves the cancer cells into oblivion. Additionally, low protein intake tends to minimize the mTOR pathway that accelerates cell proliferation.
This type of diet, in which you restrict all but non-starchy vegetable carbs and replace them with low to moderate amounts of high quality protein and high amounts of beneficial fat, is what I recommend for everyone, whether you have cancer or not. It’s a diet that will help optimize your weight and all chronic degenerative disease. Eating this way will help you convert from carb burning mode to fat burning.
Dr. Thomas Seyfried is one of the leading pioneer academic researchers in promoting how to treat cancer nutritionally. He’s been teaching neurogenetics and neurochemistry as it relates to cancer treatment at Yale University and Boston College for the past 25 years.
He’s written over 150 peer-reviewed scientific articles and book chapters, and has also published a book, Cancer as a Metabolic Disease: On the Origin, Management, and Prevention of Cancer.
“We’re not going to make major advances in the management of cancer until it becomes recognized as a metabolic disease. But in order to do that, you have to present a massive counterargument against the gene theory of cancer,” he says.
“One of the key issues here is that if you transplant the nucleus of a cancer cell into a normal cell, you don’t get cancer cells. You can actually get normal tissues and sometimes a whole normal organism from the nucleus of a cancer cell. Now, if the tumors are being driven by driver genes – all these kinds of mutations and things that we hear about – how is it possible that all of this is changed when you place this cancer nucleus into the cytoplasm of a cell with normal mitochondria?
The gene theory cannot address this. It clearly argues strongly against the concept that genes are driving this process. Actually, a very few people inherit genes that predispose them to cancer. Most people inherit genes that prevent cancer. And those few genes that are inherited – the germ line like the BRCA1 mutations, B53, and a few other very rare cancers – these inherited mutations appear to disrupt the function of the mitochondria.”
“When we’re dealing with glucose and [cancer] management, we know from a large number of studies that if respiration of the tumor is ineffective, in order to survive, the cells must use an alternative source of energy, which is fermentation. We know that glucose is the primary fuel for fermentation. Fermentation becomes a primary energy-generating process in the tumor cell. By targeting the fuel for that process, we then have the capability of potentially managing the disease.”
To read the rest of this article click here
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
How a small factory in Port Elizabeth conquered the world
By Ray Hartley
ACROSS the lake from the Nelson Mandela Bay Stadium in Port Elizabeth’s North End stands a factory that proves the conventional wisdom about South African manufacturing wrong.
The odds are stacked against the Eastern Cape. Years of government neglect have resulted in schools collapsing, the public health system plumbing the depths and roads deteriorating. An audit report last year showed that R9bn earmarked for education over the past nine years could not be accounted for. That is a billion a year “lost” by officials in South Africa’s least-competent bureaucracy.
None of this deterred Stephen Saad, CEO and a co-founder of the Aspen group, from creating a globally competitive business.
By going against the grain, he has over 15 years built one of the world’s premier pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities in the heart of Port Elizabeth. In 1998, Aspen listed at R2.40. These days it trades around R190, giving it a market capitalisation of more than R80bn. This makes it one of South Africa’s top 40 companies by size.
You would expect to find Mr Saad presiding over his company’s global production, distribution and sales operations from one of Sandton’s gleaming towers. Instead, he works from a modest two-storey block in an office park in Umhlanga Ridge, north of the Durban CBD.
If you put aside the exclusive address, it is the sort of office that a start-up desktop publishing business might choose after landing its first big contract.
In the head office boardroom, Mr Saad is quick to smile, quick with a joke and easy to get along with. But the facade conceals a driven, even predatory mindset. Where others see obstacles, Mr Saad sees competitive advantage and opportunity.
“If you look at the world, if you look at Japan — it’s got nothing. It’s a tiny, resourceless place with too many people on it. If you look at Africa with all its resources and its size — 20% of the world’s land and 15% of its population — do we think we can’t compete with them?
“You’ve got to be very clear in life about where you are going. If you want to lead people, you need a vision. People need to know there is hope. But to have that vision, you’ve got to face your reality. You’ve got to say: ‘I’ve actually got no skills in South Africa, so what am I going to do? Do I give up or do I develop the skills?’” he said.
A graduate of Durban High School and the then University of Natal, Mr Saad trained as a chartered accountant. He entered the pharmaceutical business through Quickmed and began a journey of restless acquisition and expansion. Quickmed merged with Covan to form Zurich, which was sold for R75m in 1993.
He served out his restraint-of-trade period by transforming the lossmaking Varsity College. It sold for R100m. Then Mr Saad returned to pharmaceuticals with the launch of a new company.
He wanted to give it a name that spoke of the future. Mr Saad liked the association that his old company, Zurich, had with snow and skiing. He wanted to bring the same fresh, clean image to his new company. He decided to call it Aspen.
His first move was to buy the moribund SA Druggists business for R2.4bn in 1999, a move he describes as “the biggest risk we ever took”. The makers of the Lennon range of homely remedies, it was a dinosaur of the apartheid era.
The traditional saw-tooth roof of the Lennon factory still stands on the Aspen precinct in Nelson Mandela Bay, a reminder of more Dickensian times when production took place using antiquated equipment for a small local market.
It is dwarfed by two new state-of-the-art facilities, known to the Aspen management as Unit One and Unit Two, which were constructed to take Aspen from small local producer to fierce global competitor. Between them, they produce 10 billion tablets a year for the world market.
Both units meet the highest global production standards. In addition to accreditation by the local Medicines Control Council (MCC), it has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, the UK medicines control authorities and a raft of other global bodies.
The tablets and medicines Aspen produces will be sold in 150 countries across the globe.
How Port Elizabeth came to be home to one of the world’s premier drug-manufacturing facilities is a story Mr Saad relishes telling.
After acquiring SA Druggists, it was decision time. “What we inherited was something so antiquated and out of date that it would battle to pass an MCC inspection.”
The possibility of renaming the group after the Lennon line of products was tossed around and rejected with what can only be described as “Durban boykie logic”. In the post-communist world, the association with “Lenin” was old-fashioned and negative, Mr Saad said with a chuckle.
The real challenge was how to make Aspen globally competitive while building a reputation for quality, a non-negotiable in the pharmaceutical industry. Though it was possible to produce in South Africa at 20% to 30% cheaper than in Europe, the real threat came from the East.
Mr Saad made regular trips to India, visiting Hyderabad, Delhi and Bangalore. The numbers were intimidating. “It’s quite daunting at first when people say they make tablets at X dollars a thousand and I know I can’t even turn my machines on for that.”
The Indians were manufacturing at $3 or $4 a thousand and packing for an additional $3 or $4 a thousand. Mr Saad pointed out a little-known fact about pharmaceuticals: the packaging — blister packs, inserts, boxes and so on — costs about the same as making the tablets themselves.
“You’ve got to put a tablet into a blister pack, you’ve then got to seal that blister pack, you’ve then got to put a package insert around it, then you’ve got to put it in a box. And that’s where all the expensive machinery is.”
By contrast, making tablets is relatively simple: “You take a powder, you wet it, you dry it, you compress it.”
“When we compared ourselves with Asia, we were more than twice as expensive. It was a real, real problem for us. We had to come up with a model. It’s no use being half competitive — you don’t want to be stuck in no-man’s land.”
The answer lay in volume — Mr Saad did the maths. A facility scaled up to produce a billion tablets would still not be competitive. “We needed 10-billion tablets. At five billion or six billion, we break even. To do that, you had to mechanise, you had to build for much more capacity than you had,” he said.
Unit One and then later Unit Two were built with the capacity to grow rapidly. “We built a very big building. We put in one machine, another machine ...”
The genius of it was that the costs — of the buildings, of the installation of air conditioning and of the basic machinery — were sunk up front. After that, new lines could be introduced based on demand without requiring fresh infrastructure.
The end result was a highly mechanised and flexible facility that Aspen has been able to constantly expand. “We are still adding machines as we speak — each time we add another machine with seven operators. It’s not hugely labour-intensive any more.”
To accomplish this, Aspen needed to develop an organisation that could jump through the many hoops to meet stringent quality expectations, but remain agile and adaptive.
Mr Saad counts leadership as Aspen’s primary resource. “And,” he added, “there is a very big difference between management and leadership. Leadership means you have to roll up your sleeves and work.”
He paused. “I’m going to say something very controversial here. Corporate South Africa is just a huge disappointment to me. I think corporate South Africa is hugely overpaid. If you’ve got to run a restaurant to make a million bucks and these guys are making R20m — I’d like to see them run 20 restaurants successfully before they ask for the R20m.”
He cannot hide his contempt for bureaucracy. “Take our factory of 10-billion tablets. To compete with us, a multinational will have 10 factories with a billion tablets from each, split across all sorts of geographies. They will have regional managers, managers of the regional managers at central and a huge head office structure.”
Mr Saad’s disdain for corporate management comes from his time working the street. “I started from nothing — I’ve dealt with entrepreneurs, guys who trade, guys who sell bottles, guys who sell cardboard, and I’ve always been impressed by their level of entrepreneurship. The way they trade, they know their businesses and they feel passion.”
General manager Chris Stubbs leads the team managing Aspen’s Unit One and Unit Two facilities. Sitting with his leadership team in his very ordinary office on the factory premises, he projected an intensity which seems to infect those around him.
The production facility succeeds, he said, because managers work together. “We just don’t fight.”
Seated around the table were key members of his team: operations manager Branson Bosman, quality assurance manager Karien Dutton and demand and operations planning manager Janine Mauritz. It is their job to align factory output with the constantly changing demand for new medicines. In his office, bureaucracy is a swear word. “There’s no hifalutin MBA quadrant analysis. We do what’s in front of our face,” said Stubbs.
“I can’t run a structure out of power, I have to run it as a collective. Inside Aspen, while there is respect for authority, there is no respect for structure,” he said.
Later he points out that at the factory, there is no boardroom and, he adds, “there is no executive dining room — bring your sarmies”.
There is an acute awareness of the fierce competition they face. Each manager works towards defined targets, which they know as “the number” — the point at which their output meets or exceeds that required to stay ahead of the competition.
“The philosophy here at Aspen is: get the job done,” said Mr Bosman, who is disarmingly young for someone charged with running a major industrial operation. Stubbs added quickly “and don’t wait for a medal”.
What Mr Stubbs strives for is “getting a consistent drumbeat going”.
Operational since 2004, Unit One was purpose-built to produce tablets according to the drumbeat with the help of gravity.
On the building’s top floor, the powdered ingredients of the drugs are poured into huge stainless-steel containers, which are mated to steel-lined holes through to a lower level. There they are mixed with other powders, wet and transformed into granules before going through to the next floor, where they are compressed into tablets. From there they are moved to the packaging facility. It operates 24 hours a day, using three shifts.
Between each floor is a “hidden” floor where the heavy technology to maintain air purity and temperature and to mix the powder is housed. It is accessible only from the outside to keep the sterile production facility away from the tramping boots of maintenance workers. On the morning that I visited, the night’s output of 17-million tablets wa s awaiting transport from the facility.
The staff who run this hi-tech operation were locally recruited. They have to have at least a matric qualification, and other jobs require technikon or university certificates. To fill the gaps in education, Aspen embarks on intensive on-the-job training.
Mr Saad said the quality of graduates was declining. “There was always a gap between theory and the real world. What we are finding is that the gap is bigger than in the past. There are guys who can’t even put the machine on. They don’t even know where the on-button is.”
What the staff lack in high-level skills they make up for in critical thinking. “That’s where South Africa is very strong — the ability to make a plan,” said Mr Stubbs.
He encourages creativity at the factory. “They are not human robots. Eastern Cape people want constant improvement and change. There’s a lot of creative passion.”
Aspen’s level of technical competence has risen dramatically. Mr Stubbs recalled that managers used to attend international conferences with wide eyes. “Most of our managers hadn’t been to Joburg, never mind London.”
“It’s not an arrogance, but we don’t buk (bow) any more,” he said.
South African workers are often described as unproductive. It is something that annoys Mr Saad. “I think there is more of a problem with South African management than with South African labour.”
In his experience, workers, “if treated properly and managed properly”, can radically improve their productivity.
“There are plenty of ways of improving productivity other than asking people to work harder — improved mechanisation, improved processes. Engineers need to be thinking and then you need to manage the whole chain to improve productivity,” he said.
When Mr Saad bought the old SA Druggists operation, his first meeting was with the trade union representative. It was an eye-opener.
“He said something to me which I will never, ever forget, because it was so foreign to me. He said: ‘How could I possibly ask the workers to be more productive? If they are twice as productive, you will need half as many jobs.’”
Mr Saad could not duck the reality, telling him: “Yes, there will be job losses, but if we get it right, we will increase and grow our jobs.” If his plan worked, workers who were laid off would return to a more successful company. And, he promised, workers would become shareholders.
Workers were given shares when they were priced at R4 each. Their value has grown 50 times. When the share hit R30, the union made a wise decision, using its provident fund to buy more shares. “The share price went up, so the provident fund went up and they had this huge equity interest. They’ve got billions in the company.”
The constant focus on productivity has led to a doubling of the number of employees. And, said Mr Saad, they are well paid, somewhere between the high pay of Europe and the low pay of Asia. “The problem with low-cost labour is that it makes you inefficient, no matter where you are,” he said.
His state-of-the-art factory in place, Mr Saad’s next battle was to find a market for the 10 billion tablets a year needed to be globally competitive. Aspen had to build a global market for “generics” — medicines made using expired patents, which suffered from a bad reputation with consumers. “You couldn’t get into private hospitals — the specialists just wouldn’t use your product,” Mr Saad recalled.
To fill the manufacturing capacity, Aspen began acquiring brands. Its competitive production costs offered multinationals such as GlaxoSmithKline an opportunity to extend the life of some of their products.
“Our production was so good here that we could buy products, reduce the cost of goods, increase the competitiveness of the product. We were able to extend product life cycles — even grow products that were previously dying,” Mr Saad said.
The breakthrough came when Aspen began manufacturing in co-operation with global pharmaceutical companies. The ace up its sleeve was its investment in building a facility approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.
When the US decided to invest billions in rolling out Aids drugs under its president’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief — known as Pepfar — Aspen was able to offer cost-effective production located in one of the countries most profoundly affected by the epidemic.
“That changed the perception of the business and it really drove our business growth in South Africa. We could go in to specialists and they could feel comfortable using our products. We became a one-stop shop,” said Mr Saad.
By 2006, Aspen had become the biggest supplier of antiretroviral drugs in Africa, concluding distribution deals with Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche and Tibotec.
“We are globally competitive with Asia. We are right up there. Multinationals see this — ‘Gee, what’s Aspen doing, it’s worth partnering them.’” Success becomes self-fulfilling,” said Mr Saad.
After buying and turning around the Australian drug company Sigma, Aspen was able to brag that the name of one of its products was written on one in five scripts in Australia, second only to South Africa. At home, one in four scripts is for an Aspen product.
Getting Australian doctors to give his products a hearing was a battle. Then came a stroke of genius — multinational companies were forcing their reps to retire at 60.
Aspen hired the retired reps and suddenly the company had a way into surgeries across Australia. Mr Saad explained the logic. “Now you tell me, no matter how pretty the 19-year-old rep is — who are you as the doctor going to see first?”
Mr Saad’s approach is relentless expansion. Aspen is now involved in talks with the global giant Merck, which Mr Saad was reluctant to comment on because of a cautionary notice. But the same approach of analysing “detail, detail, detail” is being taken.
He has learnt something else from his dealings with Brazil. “South Africans are small change in corruption relative to Latin America. Of course, corruption’s bad, but the biggest problem here is competence. Incompetence is a bigger risk to this country than corruption.”
But Mr Saad does not dwell on risks. He has shown how, even in one of South Africa’s most economically depressed regions, it is possible to build a world-class manufacturing business that creates jobs. He expects his staff to work hard and constantly improve productivity. But, he said, there must be a balance between work, family and relaxation.
“When do you know when you’ve got it? When you laugh and you laugh out loud. You don’t want to look back in 10 years’ time and ask, ‘What did I do all that for? Did I do it for money?’ There’s got to be more to it than that.”
• This article was first published in Sunday Times: Business Times
http://www.bdlive.co.za/business/healthcare/2013/06/16/how-a-small-factory-in-port-elizabeth-conquered-the-world
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
ACROSS the lake from the Nelson Mandela Bay Stadium in Port Elizabeth’s North End stands a factory that proves the conventional wisdom about South African manufacturing wrong.
The odds are stacked against the Eastern Cape. Years of government neglect have resulted in schools collapsing, the public health system plumbing the depths and roads deteriorating. An audit report last year showed that R9bn earmarked for education over the past nine years could not be accounted for. That is a billion a year “lost” by officials in South Africa’s least-competent bureaucracy.
None of this deterred Stephen Saad, CEO and a co-founder of the Aspen group, from creating a globally competitive business.
By going against the grain, he has over 15 years built one of the world’s premier pharmaceutical manufacturing facilities in the heart of Port Elizabeth. In 1998, Aspen listed at R2.40. These days it trades around R190, giving it a market capitalisation of more than R80bn. This makes it one of South Africa’s top 40 companies by size.
You would expect to find Mr Saad presiding over his company’s global production, distribution and sales operations from one of Sandton’s gleaming towers. Instead, he works from a modest two-storey block in an office park in Umhlanga Ridge, north of the Durban CBD.
If you put aside the exclusive address, it is the sort of office that a start-up desktop publishing business might choose after landing its first big contract.
In the head office boardroom, Mr Saad is quick to smile, quick with a joke and easy to get along with. But the facade conceals a driven, even predatory mindset. Where others see obstacles, Mr Saad sees competitive advantage and opportunity.
“If you look at the world, if you look at Japan — it’s got nothing. It’s a tiny, resourceless place with too many people on it. If you look at Africa with all its resources and its size — 20% of the world’s land and 15% of its population — do we think we can’t compete with them?
“You’ve got to be very clear in life about where you are going. If you want to lead people, you need a vision. People need to know there is hope. But to have that vision, you’ve got to face your reality. You’ve got to say: ‘I’ve actually got no skills in South Africa, so what am I going to do? Do I give up or do I develop the skills?’” he said.
A graduate of Durban High School and the then University of Natal, Mr Saad trained as a chartered accountant. He entered the pharmaceutical business through Quickmed and began a journey of restless acquisition and expansion. Quickmed merged with Covan to form Zurich, which was sold for R75m in 1993.
He served out his restraint-of-trade period by transforming the lossmaking Varsity College. It sold for R100m. Then Mr Saad returned to pharmaceuticals with the launch of a new company.
He wanted to give it a name that spoke of the future. Mr Saad liked the association that his old company, Zurich, had with snow and skiing. He wanted to bring the same fresh, clean image to his new company. He decided to call it Aspen.
His first move was to buy the moribund SA Druggists business for R2.4bn in 1999, a move he describes as “the biggest risk we ever took”. The makers of the Lennon range of homely remedies, it was a dinosaur of the apartheid era.
The traditional saw-tooth roof of the Lennon factory still stands on the Aspen precinct in Nelson Mandela Bay, a reminder of more Dickensian times when production took place using antiquated equipment for a small local market.
It is dwarfed by two new state-of-the-art facilities, known to the Aspen management as Unit One and Unit Two, which were constructed to take Aspen from small local producer to fierce global competitor. Between them, they produce 10 billion tablets a year for the world market.
Both units meet the highest global production standards. In addition to accreditation by the local Medicines Control Council (MCC), it has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, the UK medicines control authorities and a raft of other global bodies.
The tablets and medicines Aspen produces will be sold in 150 countries across the globe.
How Port Elizabeth came to be home to one of the world’s premier drug-manufacturing facilities is a story Mr Saad relishes telling.
After acquiring SA Druggists, it was decision time. “What we inherited was something so antiquated and out of date that it would battle to pass an MCC inspection.”
The possibility of renaming the group after the Lennon line of products was tossed around and rejected with what can only be described as “Durban boykie logic”. In the post-communist world, the association with “Lenin” was old-fashioned and negative, Mr Saad said with a chuckle.
The real challenge was how to make Aspen globally competitive while building a reputation for quality, a non-negotiable in the pharmaceutical industry. Though it was possible to produce in South Africa at 20% to 30% cheaper than in Europe, the real threat came from the East.
Mr Saad made regular trips to India, visiting Hyderabad, Delhi and Bangalore. The numbers were intimidating. “It’s quite daunting at first when people say they make tablets at X dollars a thousand and I know I can’t even turn my machines on for that.”
The Indians were manufacturing at $3 or $4 a thousand and packing for an additional $3 or $4 a thousand. Mr Saad pointed out a little-known fact about pharmaceuticals: the packaging — blister packs, inserts, boxes and so on — costs about the same as making the tablets themselves.
“You’ve got to put a tablet into a blister pack, you’ve then got to seal that blister pack, you’ve then got to put a package insert around it, then you’ve got to put it in a box. And that’s where all the expensive machinery is.”
By contrast, making tablets is relatively simple: “You take a powder, you wet it, you dry it, you compress it.”
“When we compared ourselves with Asia, we were more than twice as expensive. It was a real, real problem for us. We had to come up with a model. It’s no use being half competitive — you don’t want to be stuck in no-man’s land.”
The answer lay in volume — Mr Saad did the maths. A facility scaled up to produce a billion tablets would still not be competitive. “We needed 10-billion tablets. At five billion or six billion, we break even. To do that, you had to mechanise, you had to build for much more capacity than you had,” he said.
Unit One and then later Unit Two were built with the capacity to grow rapidly. “We built a very big building. We put in one machine, another machine ...”
The genius of it was that the costs — of the buildings, of the installation of air conditioning and of the basic machinery — were sunk up front. After that, new lines could be introduced based on demand without requiring fresh infrastructure.
The end result was a highly mechanised and flexible facility that Aspen has been able to constantly expand. “We are still adding machines as we speak — each time we add another machine with seven operators. It’s not hugely labour-intensive any more.”
To accomplish this, Aspen needed to develop an organisation that could jump through the many hoops to meet stringent quality expectations, but remain agile and adaptive.
Mr Saad counts leadership as Aspen’s primary resource. “And,” he added, “there is a very big difference between management and leadership. Leadership means you have to roll up your sleeves and work.”
He paused. “I’m going to say something very controversial here. Corporate South Africa is just a huge disappointment to me. I think corporate South Africa is hugely overpaid. If you’ve got to run a restaurant to make a million bucks and these guys are making R20m — I’d like to see them run 20 restaurants successfully before they ask for the R20m.”
He cannot hide his contempt for bureaucracy. “Take our factory of 10-billion tablets. To compete with us, a multinational will have 10 factories with a billion tablets from each, split across all sorts of geographies. They will have regional managers, managers of the regional managers at central and a huge head office structure.”
Mr Saad’s disdain for corporate management comes from his time working the street. “I started from nothing — I’ve dealt with entrepreneurs, guys who trade, guys who sell bottles, guys who sell cardboard, and I’ve always been impressed by their level of entrepreneurship. The way they trade, they know their businesses and they feel passion.”
General manager Chris Stubbs leads the team managing Aspen’s Unit One and Unit Two facilities. Sitting with his leadership team in his very ordinary office on the factory premises, he projected an intensity which seems to infect those around him.
The production facility succeeds, he said, because managers work together. “We just don’t fight.”
Seated around the table were key members of his team: operations manager Branson Bosman, quality assurance manager Karien Dutton and demand and operations planning manager Janine Mauritz. It is their job to align factory output with the constantly changing demand for new medicines. In his office, bureaucracy is a swear word. “There’s no hifalutin MBA quadrant analysis. We do what’s in front of our face,” said Stubbs.
“I can’t run a structure out of power, I have to run it as a collective. Inside Aspen, while there is respect for authority, there is no respect for structure,” he said.
Later he points out that at the factory, there is no boardroom and, he adds, “there is no executive dining room — bring your sarmies”.
There is an acute awareness of the fierce competition they face. Each manager works towards defined targets, which they know as “the number” — the point at which their output meets or exceeds that required to stay ahead of the competition.
“The philosophy here at Aspen is: get the job done,” said Mr Bosman, who is disarmingly young for someone charged with running a major industrial operation. Stubbs added quickly “and don’t wait for a medal”.
What Mr Stubbs strives for is “getting a consistent drumbeat going”.
Operational since 2004, Unit One was purpose-built to produce tablets according to the drumbeat with the help of gravity.
On the building’s top floor, the powdered ingredients of the drugs are poured into huge stainless-steel containers, which are mated to steel-lined holes through to a lower level. There they are mixed with other powders, wet and transformed into granules before going through to the next floor, where they are compressed into tablets. From there they are moved to the packaging facility. It operates 24 hours a day, using three shifts.
Between each floor is a “hidden” floor where the heavy technology to maintain air purity and temperature and to mix the powder is housed. It is accessible only from the outside to keep the sterile production facility away from the tramping boots of maintenance workers. On the morning that I visited, the night’s output of 17-million tablets wa s awaiting transport from the facility.
The staff who run this hi-tech operation were locally recruited. They have to have at least a matric qualification, and other jobs require technikon or university certificates. To fill the gaps in education, Aspen embarks on intensive on-the-job training.
Mr Saad said the quality of graduates was declining. “There was always a gap between theory and the real world. What we are finding is that the gap is bigger than in the past. There are guys who can’t even put the machine on. They don’t even know where the on-button is.”
What the staff lack in high-level skills they make up for in critical thinking. “That’s where South Africa is very strong — the ability to make a plan,” said Mr Stubbs.
He encourages creativity at the factory. “They are not human robots. Eastern Cape people want constant improvement and change. There’s a lot of creative passion.”
Aspen’s level of technical competence has risen dramatically. Mr Stubbs recalled that managers used to attend international conferences with wide eyes. “Most of our managers hadn’t been to Joburg, never mind London.”
“It’s not an arrogance, but we don’t buk (bow) any more,” he said.
South African workers are often described as unproductive. It is something that annoys Mr Saad. “I think there is more of a problem with South African management than with South African labour.”
In his experience, workers, “if treated properly and managed properly”, can radically improve their productivity.
“There are plenty of ways of improving productivity other than asking people to work harder — improved mechanisation, improved processes. Engineers need to be thinking and then you need to manage the whole chain to improve productivity,” he said.
When Mr Saad bought the old SA Druggists operation, his first meeting was with the trade union representative. It was an eye-opener.
“He said something to me which I will never, ever forget, because it was so foreign to me. He said: ‘How could I possibly ask the workers to be more productive? If they are twice as productive, you will need half as many jobs.’”
Mr Saad could not duck the reality, telling him: “Yes, there will be job losses, but if we get it right, we will increase and grow our jobs.” If his plan worked, workers who were laid off would return to a more successful company. And, he promised, workers would become shareholders.
Workers were given shares when they were priced at R4 each. Their value has grown 50 times. When the share hit R30, the union made a wise decision, using its provident fund to buy more shares. “The share price went up, so the provident fund went up and they had this huge equity interest. They’ve got billions in the company.”
The constant focus on productivity has led to a doubling of the number of employees. And, said Mr Saad, they are well paid, somewhere between the high pay of Europe and the low pay of Asia. “The problem with low-cost labour is that it makes you inefficient, no matter where you are,” he said.
His state-of-the-art factory in place, Mr Saad’s next battle was to find a market for the 10 billion tablets a year needed to be globally competitive. Aspen had to build a global market for “generics” — medicines made using expired patents, which suffered from a bad reputation with consumers. “You couldn’t get into private hospitals — the specialists just wouldn’t use your product,” Mr Saad recalled.
To fill the manufacturing capacity, Aspen began acquiring brands. Its competitive production costs offered multinationals such as GlaxoSmithKline an opportunity to extend the life of some of their products.
“Our production was so good here that we could buy products, reduce the cost of goods, increase the competitiveness of the product. We were able to extend product life cycles — even grow products that were previously dying,” Mr Saad said.
The breakthrough came when Aspen began manufacturing in co-operation with global pharmaceutical companies. The ace up its sleeve was its investment in building a facility approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.
When the US decided to invest billions in rolling out Aids drugs under its president’s Emergency Plan for Aids Relief — known as Pepfar — Aspen was able to offer cost-effective production located in one of the countries most profoundly affected by the epidemic.
“That changed the perception of the business and it really drove our business growth in South Africa. We could go in to specialists and they could feel comfortable using our products. We became a one-stop shop,” said Mr Saad.
By 2006, Aspen had become the biggest supplier of antiretroviral drugs in Africa, concluding distribution deals with Merck, Sharp & Dohme, Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche and Tibotec.
“We are globally competitive with Asia. We are right up there. Multinationals see this — ‘Gee, what’s Aspen doing, it’s worth partnering them.’” Success becomes self-fulfilling,” said Mr Saad.
After buying and turning around the Australian drug company Sigma, Aspen was able to brag that the name of one of its products was written on one in five scripts in Australia, second only to South Africa. At home, one in four scripts is for an Aspen product.
Getting Australian doctors to give his products a hearing was a battle. Then came a stroke of genius — multinational companies were forcing their reps to retire at 60.
Aspen hired the retired reps and suddenly the company had a way into surgeries across Australia. Mr Saad explained the logic. “Now you tell me, no matter how pretty the 19-year-old rep is — who are you as the doctor going to see first?”
Mr Saad’s approach is relentless expansion. Aspen is now involved in talks with the global giant Merck, which Mr Saad was reluctant to comment on because of a cautionary notice. But the same approach of analysing “detail, detail, detail” is being taken.
He has learnt something else from his dealings with Brazil. “South Africans are small change in corruption relative to Latin America. Of course, corruption’s bad, but the biggest problem here is competence. Incompetence is a bigger risk to this country than corruption.”
But Mr Saad does not dwell on risks. He has shown how, even in one of South Africa’s most economically depressed regions, it is possible to build a world-class manufacturing business that creates jobs. He expects his staff to work hard and constantly improve productivity. But, he said, there must be a balance between work, family and relaxation.
“When do you know when you’ve got it? When you laugh and you laugh out loud. You don’t want to look back in 10 years’ time and ask, ‘What did I do all that for? Did I do it for money?’ There’s got to be more to it than that.”
• This article was first published in Sunday Times: Business Times
http://www.bdlive.co.za/business/healthcare/2013/06/16/how-a-small-factory-in-port-elizabeth-conquered-the-world
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
Sunday, 16 June 2013
6 Little-Known Facts About Nipples
Nipples are more interesting than one would think.
We all have nipples, those delightful little nubs. For many of us, they're actually what's called a secondary erogenous zone, especially for women, which means that stimulating them can send pleasurable feelings right down to the genitals. Even so, some of us are very sensitive and others find their nipples are an absolute no-go zone. Wherever you find yourself on the spectrum, we believe these curious nipple facts will thrill you. (Read about other, lesser-known erogenous zones in The 6 Most Underrated Erogenous Zones.)
Your Nipples Are Perfect
No two nipples are alike. That means that the two nipples on your body may not be a mirror image of each other. This is normal.
The larger outer ring is your areola. For some women, the areola is light pink. For others, it can be darker and range from red to brown. For some women the areola becomes darker when they’re sexually excited. As a result, some cultures have even been known to paint their nipples to darken them in the hope of inspiring passion in their mates.
Within the areola there can be little bumps. These bumps are the product of your Montgomery glands. These glands produce a protective, white, oily lubricant for the skin. This is also normal. Don’t squeeze those little bumps; they are there for a reason and opening them up can cause infection.
Females can grow hairs around their nipples. Our entire bodies are covered in fine, often almost invisible hair and sometimes a woman will have darker hairs that look almost like little eye lashes on the outer edge of the areola. These little hairs are more proof that you are normal.
Got Milk?
There are two features that are unique to mammals: our hair and our milk producing breasts. The scientific term for having nipples is mammillated.
Each nipple has about 15 to 20 tiny openings. Some connect to milk ducts and some to the Montgomery glands I mentioned. The little whitish bumps you're seeing let you know where some of these openings are.
Other animals, like goats and cows, have one reservoir called an udder. The milk discharges through an opening in the udder called a teat. Still more curious is the platypus. A platypus does not have nipples or teats. Her milk is secreted out of two round patches of skin on her belly. Weird, huh?
Headlights On
Erect nipples always draw our attention, although it is a misconception that erect nipples are an indication that a woman is sexually aroused. (In other words, just because she’s got erect nipples doesn’t necessarily mean she’s raring to go!) Nipples become erect for many reasons, some of which are not sexual in nature, like if you are cold, or if they get sensation from your clothing rubbing on them. And sometimes a woman’s nipples may not be erect even when she is sexually excited.
Innie vs. Outie
Inverted nipples are fairly common. Anywhere from 10 to 20 percent of all women have them. An inverted nipple is caused by shorter-than-usual milk-bearing ducts in the breast. Those ducts are attached to the nipple and, in these cases, prevent the nipple itself from projecting. So the nipple may lie flat or even push in a little rather than projecting out. Inverted nipples don’t pose any health risk, although they may be an obstacle to new mothers as they breast-feed.
The easiest way to check whether your nipples are inverted is to gently pinch behind one, around the edges of the areola. If the nipple protrudes, it is not inverted. If your nipple is inverted it will actually retract into the breast. If you have inverted nipples and are interested in correcting it, there are solutions. Gently rolling the nipple may do the trick. For pregnant women who need to correct inverted nipples for breastfeeding, check out a maternity shop for disks that attach to the nipples and are designed to be worn inside a bra. This simple device gently stretches the tissue and encourages the nipple to stand outward.
Evolutionary Awesomeness (or Trickery?)
Human females are the only mammals that develop breasts and nipples that remain full and prominent, despite the fact that they are not lactating. Every other mammal only experiences prominent development during pregnancy and lactation.
Scientists speculate that the human female’s full breasts and erect nipples are a product of evolutionary development as a species. For other mammals, large breasts would be a sign that the female is lactating and not ovulating, and is therefore unavailable for procreation. Human females have developed ways of disguising when they are and are not fertile in order to confuse male mates and appear to be sexually desirable even when they are not ovulating. But we're also one of the few species that has sex just for fun! (Did you know that humans also have a hidden erogenous zone? Find out where it is in Your Hidden Erogenous Zone.)
Triple Nipple
Every now and then, you'll come across someone with an extra nipple - it's not that uncommon! These "supernumerary" nipples are common in many species, including primates, rodents and ruminants. Guys have extra nipples more often than females; 1 in 18 males and 1 in about 50 females have extra nipples. And a very select numbers of people have as many five or six nipples. Extra nipples usually run down the abdomen, along the milk line, but they have also been found on other locations, like on a person’s foot.
Whether they're big and bouncy or cute and pert, breasts - and their nipples - have a lot in common. But they're also all a little bit different, and a little unique. That means you'll have a little exploring to do, both with yourself, and with any new partner.
Further reading
The 6 Most Underrated Erogenous Zones
Your Hidden Erogenous Zone
Source : http://www.alternet.org/sex-amp-relationships/breasts-nipples
We all have nipples, those delightful little nubs. For many of us, they're actually what's called a secondary erogenous zone, especially for women, which means that stimulating them can send pleasurable feelings right down to the genitals. Even so, some of us are very sensitive and others find their nipples are an absolute no-go zone. Wherever you find yourself on the spectrum, we believe these curious nipple facts will thrill you. (Read about other, lesser-known erogenous zones in The 6 Most Underrated Erogenous Zones.)
Your Nipples Are Perfect
No two nipples are alike. That means that the two nipples on your body may not be a mirror image of each other. This is normal.
The larger outer ring is your areola. For some women, the areola is light pink. For others, it can be darker and range from red to brown. For some women the areola becomes darker when they’re sexually excited. As a result, some cultures have even been known to paint their nipples to darken them in the hope of inspiring passion in their mates.
Within the areola there can be little bumps. These bumps are the product of your Montgomery glands. These glands produce a protective, white, oily lubricant for the skin. This is also normal. Don’t squeeze those little bumps; they are there for a reason and opening them up can cause infection.
Females can grow hairs around their nipples. Our entire bodies are covered in fine, often almost invisible hair and sometimes a woman will have darker hairs that look almost like little eye lashes on the outer edge of the areola. These little hairs are more proof that you are normal.
Got Milk?
There are two features that are unique to mammals: our hair and our milk producing breasts. The scientific term for having nipples is mammillated.
Each nipple has about 15 to 20 tiny openings. Some connect to milk ducts and some to the Montgomery glands I mentioned. The little whitish bumps you're seeing let you know where some of these openings are.
Other animals, like goats and cows, have one reservoir called an udder. The milk discharges through an opening in the udder called a teat. Still more curious is the platypus. A platypus does not have nipples or teats. Her milk is secreted out of two round patches of skin on her belly. Weird, huh?
Headlights On
Erect nipples always draw our attention, although it is a misconception that erect nipples are an indication that a woman is sexually aroused. (In other words, just because she’s got erect nipples doesn’t necessarily mean she’s raring to go!) Nipples become erect for many reasons, some of which are not sexual in nature, like if you are cold, or if they get sensation from your clothing rubbing on them. And sometimes a woman’s nipples may not be erect even when she is sexually excited.
Innie vs. Outie
Inverted nipples are fairly common. Anywhere from 10 to 20 percent of all women have them. An inverted nipple is caused by shorter-than-usual milk-bearing ducts in the breast. Those ducts are attached to the nipple and, in these cases, prevent the nipple itself from projecting. So the nipple may lie flat or even push in a little rather than projecting out. Inverted nipples don’t pose any health risk, although they may be an obstacle to new mothers as they breast-feed.
The easiest way to check whether your nipples are inverted is to gently pinch behind one, around the edges of the areola. If the nipple protrudes, it is not inverted. If your nipple is inverted it will actually retract into the breast. If you have inverted nipples and are interested in correcting it, there are solutions. Gently rolling the nipple may do the trick. For pregnant women who need to correct inverted nipples for breastfeeding, check out a maternity shop for disks that attach to the nipples and are designed to be worn inside a bra. This simple device gently stretches the tissue and encourages the nipple to stand outward.
Evolutionary Awesomeness (or Trickery?)
Human females are the only mammals that develop breasts and nipples that remain full and prominent, despite the fact that they are not lactating. Every other mammal only experiences prominent development during pregnancy and lactation.
Scientists speculate that the human female’s full breasts and erect nipples are a product of evolutionary development as a species. For other mammals, large breasts would be a sign that the female is lactating and not ovulating, and is therefore unavailable for procreation. Human females have developed ways of disguising when they are and are not fertile in order to confuse male mates and appear to be sexually desirable even when they are not ovulating. But we're also one of the few species that has sex just for fun! (Did you know that humans also have a hidden erogenous zone? Find out where it is in Your Hidden Erogenous Zone.)
Triple Nipple
Every now and then, you'll come across someone with an extra nipple - it's not that uncommon! These "supernumerary" nipples are common in many species, including primates, rodents and ruminants. Guys have extra nipples more often than females; 1 in 18 males and 1 in about 50 females have extra nipples. And a very select numbers of people have as many five or six nipples. Extra nipples usually run down the abdomen, along the milk line, but they have also been found on other locations, like on a person’s foot.
Whether they're big and bouncy or cute and pert, breasts - and their nipples - have a lot in common. But they're also all a little bit different, and a little unique. That means you'll have a little exploring to do, both with yourself, and with any new partner.
Further reading
The 6 Most Underrated Erogenous Zones
Your Hidden Erogenous Zone
Source : http://www.alternet.org/sex-amp-relationships/breasts-nipples
Saturday, 15 June 2013
Breathing Exercises to Reduce High Blood Pressure
Step No. 1 - Relax. Play gentle music (such as classical or rhythm and blues) and get as comfortable and relaxed as possible.
Step No. 2 - Breathe in sharply, quickly and deeply using the chest and the diaphragm, but keep to a comfortable rate. Allow the tummy to expand as the diaphragm presses downward into the abdominal cavity. You may also choose to breath in slowly, but remember that exhaling should still be twice as long.
Step No. 3 - Breathe out in a slower, more relaxed way. Breathing out should take twice as much time as breathing in. Gradually extend your exhale phase until it's approximately twice the length of your inhale phase. Do not count or use any kind of timekeeper, simply relax and let the air flow out. A short pause between exhale and inhale phases is normal. Do not force the air out sharply because the compression of the chest to expel the air also increases the blood pressure accordingly. Breathe out to dispel as much air from your lungs as possible.
Step No. 4 - Once you are used to this pattern, gradually slow your rate of breathing. Do not slow to a point of discomfort. If you feel any strain at all, you need to back off. Remember, you must stay relaxed to get the benefits.
Step No. 5 - Continue for 15 minutes. Repeat 4 or 5 times a week.
The breathing rate must be adjusted voluntarily. Our tendency is to not breathe enough volume and to not breathe at a high enough rate. Breathing exercises are required many times a day to break the old breathing patters. Practice technique regularly. If one practises the technique once every hour, over time your breathing pattern should automatically change as you become accustomed to breathing properly.
Also watch these videos
Breathing Exercises to Lower Blood Pressure (This video demonstrates the technique. It is advisable to download this video and view them few times.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEfP37J91Us
Reducing Blood Pressure with Breathing (This video clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of breathing for hypertension)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5fzM9dUTSA
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
Step No. 2 - Breathe in sharply, quickly and deeply using the chest and the diaphragm, but keep to a comfortable rate. Allow the tummy to expand as the diaphragm presses downward into the abdominal cavity. You may also choose to breath in slowly, but remember that exhaling should still be twice as long.
Step No. 3 - Breathe out in a slower, more relaxed way. Breathing out should take twice as much time as breathing in. Gradually extend your exhale phase until it's approximately twice the length of your inhale phase. Do not count or use any kind of timekeeper, simply relax and let the air flow out. A short pause between exhale and inhale phases is normal. Do not force the air out sharply because the compression of the chest to expel the air also increases the blood pressure accordingly. Breathe out to dispel as much air from your lungs as possible.
Step No. 4 - Once you are used to this pattern, gradually slow your rate of breathing. Do not slow to a point of discomfort. If you feel any strain at all, you need to back off. Remember, you must stay relaxed to get the benefits.
Step No. 5 - Continue for 15 minutes. Repeat 4 or 5 times a week.
The breathing rate must be adjusted voluntarily. Our tendency is to not breathe enough volume and to not breathe at a high enough rate. Breathing exercises are required many times a day to break the old breathing patters. Practice technique regularly. If one practises the technique once every hour, over time your breathing pattern should automatically change as you become accustomed to breathing properly.
Also watch these videos
Breathing Exercises to Lower Blood Pressure (This video demonstrates the technique. It is advisable to download this video and view them few times.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEfP37J91Us
Reducing Blood Pressure with Breathing (This video clearly demonstrates the effectiveness of breathing for hypertension)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x5fzM9dUTSA
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
Infant sleep positioners: Consumer Warning - Risk of Suffocation
Infant sleep positioners: Consumer Warning - Risk of Suffocation
AUDIENCE: Parents, Consumers, Pediatrics
ISSUE: FDA and the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued a warning not to use Infant sleep positioners. In the last 13 years, the federal government has received 12 reports of babies known to have died from suffocation associated with their sleep positioners. Most of the babies suffocated after rolling from the side to the stomach.
BACKGROUND: The most common types of sleep positioners feature bolsters attached to each side of a thin mat and wedges to elevate the baby’s head. The sleep positioners are intended to keep a baby in a desired position while sleeping. They are often used with infants under 6 months old.
RECOMMENDATION: Consumers are warned to stop using infant positioning products. Never put pillows, sleep positioners, comforters, or quilts under the baby or in the crib. Always place a baby on his or her back at night and during nap time. See the Consumer Update for links to additional information, including product photos.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Infant Sleep Positioners Pose Suffocation Risk
Two government agencies are warning parents and other caregivers not to put babies in sleep positioning products as two recent deaths underscore concerns about suffocation.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Consumer Product Safety Commission issued the warning after reviewing reports of 12 known infant deaths associated with the products.
The most common types of sleep positioners feature bolsters attached to each side of a thin mat and wedges to elevate the baby’s head. The sleep positioners are intended to keep a baby in a desired position while sleeping. They are often used with infants under 6 months old.
To reduce the risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends infants be placed to sleep on their backs on a firm surface free of soft objects, toys, and loose bedding.Advice for Consumers
STOP using infant positioning products. Using this type of product to hold an infant on his or her side or back is dangerous and unnecessary.
NEVER put pillows, sleep positioners, comforters, or quilts under the baby or in the crib.
ALWAYS place a baby on his or her back at night and during nap time.
REPORT an incident or injury from an infant sleep positioner to the Consumer Product Safety Commission by visiting www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/incident.aspx5 or calling 800-638-2772, or to FDA's MedWatch program6.
Suffocation and Other Dangers
In the last 13 years, the federal government has received 12 reports of babies known to have died from suffocation associated with their sleep positioners. Most of the babies suffocated after rolling from the side to the stomach.
In addition to the deaths, the commission has received dozens of reports of babies who were placed on their back or side in the positioners only to be found later in hazardous positions within or next to the product.
“We urge parents and caregivers to take our warning seriously and stop using these sleep positioners so children can be assured of a safe sleep,” says Inez Tenenbaum, chairman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
FDA pediatric expert Susan Cummins, M.D., M.P.H, says parents and caregivers can create a safe sleep environment for babies if they leave the crib free of pillows, comforters, quilts, toys, and other items.
“The safest crib is a bare crib,” she says. “Always put your baby on his or her back to sleep. An easy way to remember this is to follow the ABC’s of safe sleep—Alone on the Back in a bare Crib.”
Medical Claims
Some manufacturers have advertised that their products prevent SIDS, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)—in which stomach acids back up into the esophagus—or flat head syndrome, a deformation caused by pressure on one part of the skull.
Although in the past FDA has approved a number of these products for GERD or flat head syndrome, new information suggests the positioners pose a risk of suffocation.
As a result, FDA is requiring makers of FDA-cleared sleep positioners to submit data showing the products’ benefits outweigh the risks. FDA is also requesting that these manufacturers stop marketing their devices while FDA reviews the data.
Infant sleep positioner manufacturers who are making medical claims without FDA clearance must stop marketing those products immediately, agency experts say, adding there’s no evidence the devices have benefits that outweigh the risk of suffocation.
“At this time, there is no scientifically sound evidence to support the medical claims being made by the manufacturers of these infant sleep positioners,” says Cummins.
This article appears on FDA's Consumer Updates page7, which features the latest on all FDA-regulated products.
Posted: September 29, 2010
The Original article as copied above may be found at :
Source: http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm227733.htm
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
AUDIENCE: Parents, Consumers, Pediatrics
ISSUE: FDA and the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued a warning not to use Infant sleep positioners. In the last 13 years, the federal government has received 12 reports of babies known to have died from suffocation associated with their sleep positioners. Most of the babies suffocated after rolling from the side to the stomach.
BACKGROUND: The most common types of sleep positioners feature bolsters attached to each side of a thin mat and wedges to elevate the baby’s head. The sleep positioners are intended to keep a baby in a desired position while sleeping. They are often used with infants under 6 months old.
RECOMMENDATION: Consumers are warned to stop using infant positioning products. Never put pillows, sleep positioners, comforters, or quilts under the baby or in the crib. Always place a baby on his or her back at night and during nap time. See the Consumer Update for links to additional information, including product photos.
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Infant Sleep Positioners Pose Suffocation Risk
Two government agencies are warning parents and other caregivers not to put babies in sleep positioning products as two recent deaths underscore concerns about suffocation.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Consumer Product Safety Commission issued the warning after reviewing reports of 12 known infant deaths associated with the products.
The most common types of sleep positioners feature bolsters attached to each side of a thin mat and wedges to elevate the baby’s head. The sleep positioners are intended to keep a baby in a desired position while sleeping. They are often used with infants under 6 months old.
To reduce the risk of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends infants be placed to sleep on their backs on a firm surface free of soft objects, toys, and loose bedding.Advice for Consumers
STOP using infant positioning products. Using this type of product to hold an infant on his or her side or back is dangerous and unnecessary.
NEVER put pillows, sleep positioners, comforters, or quilts under the baby or in the crib.
ALWAYS place a baby on his or her back at night and during nap time.
REPORT an incident or injury from an infant sleep positioner to the Consumer Product Safety Commission by visiting www.cpsc.gov/cgibin/incident.aspx5 or calling 800-638-2772, or to FDA's MedWatch program6.
Suffocation and Other Dangers
In the last 13 years, the federal government has received 12 reports of babies known to have died from suffocation associated with their sleep positioners. Most of the babies suffocated after rolling from the side to the stomach.
In addition to the deaths, the commission has received dozens of reports of babies who were placed on their back or side in the positioners only to be found later in hazardous positions within or next to the product.
“We urge parents and caregivers to take our warning seriously and stop using these sleep positioners so children can be assured of a safe sleep,” says Inez Tenenbaum, chairman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
FDA pediatric expert Susan Cummins, M.D., M.P.H, says parents and caregivers can create a safe sleep environment for babies if they leave the crib free of pillows, comforters, quilts, toys, and other items.
“The safest crib is a bare crib,” she says. “Always put your baby on his or her back to sleep. An easy way to remember this is to follow the ABC’s of safe sleep—Alone on the Back in a bare Crib.”
Medical Claims
Some manufacturers have advertised that their products prevent SIDS, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)—in which stomach acids back up into the esophagus—or flat head syndrome, a deformation caused by pressure on one part of the skull.
Although in the past FDA has approved a number of these products for GERD or flat head syndrome, new information suggests the positioners pose a risk of suffocation.
As a result, FDA is requiring makers of FDA-cleared sleep positioners to submit data showing the products’ benefits outweigh the risks. FDA is also requesting that these manufacturers stop marketing their devices while FDA reviews the data.
Infant sleep positioner manufacturers who are making medical claims without FDA clearance must stop marketing those products immediately, agency experts say, adding there’s no evidence the devices have benefits that outweigh the risk of suffocation.
“At this time, there is no scientifically sound evidence to support the medical claims being made by the manufacturers of these infant sleep positioners,” says Cummins.
This article appears on FDA's Consumer Updates page7, which features the latest on all FDA-regulated products.
Posted: September 29, 2010
The Original article as copied above may be found at :
Source: http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/SafetyAlertsforHumanMedicalProducts/ucm227733.htm
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
Is it Dangerous to Swim Within an Hour of Eating?
Most children have probably heard from their parents that they must wait at least an hour after eating before hopping into the water for a swim. Otherwise, they could suffer cramps and drown. The theory behind this tale is actually pretty sound and has to do with a shift in blood flow in the body.
When you eat something, your body increases the blood flow to your stomach muscles to help with digestion. The larger the meal you scarf down, the more oxygenated blood your stomach needs for digestion. But this means less oxygen available for your arms and legs, which require an increased amount during exercise (whether you’re swimming, running, or cycling). Depriving your muscles of vital oxygen can lead to cramps, conceivably increasing your risk of drowning.
[What Causes a Charlie Horse?]
For recreational swimmers, the risk of getting cramps after eating is actually very low; your body has more than enough oxygen to share between your stomach and limbs. The real danger lies with those who eat huge meals before vigorous, triathlon-level exercise. Such cases can indeed lead to cramps and even vomiting. But even then, the medical consensus has long been that it’s unlikely to result in drowning; that is, unless the swimmer all-out panics and forgets how to float.
This story was provided by Life's Little Mysteries, a sister site to LiveScience. Follow Life's Little Mysteries @llmysteries. We're also on Facebook & Google+.
Source: http://www.livescience.com/22444-is-it-dangerous-to-swim-within-an-hour-of-eating.html?cmpid=514626
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
When you eat something, your body increases the blood flow to your stomach muscles to help with digestion. The larger the meal you scarf down, the more oxygenated blood your stomach needs for digestion. But this means less oxygen available for your arms and legs, which require an increased amount during exercise (whether you’re swimming, running, or cycling). Depriving your muscles of vital oxygen can lead to cramps, conceivably increasing your risk of drowning.
[What Causes a Charlie Horse?]
For recreational swimmers, the risk of getting cramps after eating is actually very low; your body has more than enough oxygen to share between your stomach and limbs. The real danger lies with those who eat huge meals before vigorous, triathlon-level exercise. Such cases can indeed lead to cramps and even vomiting. But even then, the medical consensus has long been that it’s unlikely to result in drowning; that is, unless the swimmer all-out panics and forgets how to float.
This story was provided by Life's Little Mysteries, a sister site to LiveScience. Follow Life's Little Mysteries @llmysteries. We're also on Facebook & Google+.
Source: http://www.livescience.com/22444-is-it-dangerous-to-swim-within-an-hour-of-eating.html?cmpid=514626
Medical Disclaimer
The content of this website is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended as, nor should it be considered a substitute for, professional medical or health care advice or treatment for any medical or health conditions. Do not use the information on this website for diagnosing or treating any medical or health condition. If you have or suspect you have a medical problem or health issues, promptly consult your professional registered / licensed health care provider.
The information contained in this blog and related website should not be considered complete as it is presented in summary form only and intended to provide broad consumer understanding and knowledge of diet, health, fitness, nutrition, disease and treatment options.
Dr JPB Prinsloo is the oldest, most established homoeopathic practice in South Africa.
The practice, situated in Pretoria, was established in 1956.
To learn more about homeopathy, homeopathic treatment and the legal requirements for practising as a homeopath, visit:
http://www.biocura.co.za/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)